explain how the new government model might jeopardize traditional interpretations of checks and balances
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the excerpt to know what you are talking about.
Although you did not include the excerpt, the name of the text, or the author, we can do some research and help you with the following general comments.
One historical event in the period 1787 to 1803 that would be used to support Ellis's interpretation is the United States President Thomas Jefferson's historical interpretation about the approval of the Louisiana Purchase.
For historian Joseph J. Ellis, the issue was the way President Thomas Jefferson proceeded to buy the Louisiana territory to the French, knowing that he could have been going beyond his powers as the head of the executive branch. The question for historian Ellis is not that his decision over the territory was right, but the way he implemented that decision that challenged his powers as President. Thomas Jefferson had big hopes that the next step for the American government was in the conquest of the western part of the United States.
Guido of Arrezo is a Benedectine monk from Italy and an Italian music theorist of the Medieval Era. While at Arrezo he develops new techniques and method in teaching music such as staff notation and the use of six note pattern aid "ut–re–mi–fa–so–la" which also means do–re–mi–fa–so–la).
The given quotation from Churchill means that no matter how strong the tyranny is, it can never overcome human crime.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The British political, military and writer, Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill was UK Prime Minister from 1940-145 when, during World War II, he led the Uk to victory.
This quote from Churchill implies no matter how strong a dictatorship is that human evil cannot be defeated and that will ultimately be undermined when the tyranny is triggered by people who want to destroy it.
The war of any of our strength and endurance which God has given to us has never been exceeded in the dark, deplorable catalog of a human criminal act to make war towards such a monstrous tyranny.
Klemens Metternich can be considered a conservative statesman because D) He believed that strong monarchies would lead to social and political stability. Its important to remember that the word <em>conservative means holding to traditional attitudes, values and cautions about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics in religion</em>. Klemens Metternich could be considered a conservative statesman because he held to the traditional attitudes toward politics, that being that strong monarchies were the ideal form of government to provide social and political stability for the nation.
