<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
Answer:
ok thanks for giving me the points
Answer:
Dictatorship
Explanation: he made every decision himself, he puts himself at a higher class than everyone else,and he manipulate the French citizens, and caused mass war with other countries in the Europe to expand his empire.
Answer:
In Athens, men over the age of 20 were citizens, while in Sparta, all adults were citizens.
Explanation:
b
Delegate from the North: "Many states have passed laws against slavery, and some Northerners are involved in activities to end slavery."
b. Delegate from the South: "The South is not ready to abolish slavery. Our economy is too dependent upon it."
