All categories

2 years ago

Which claim is not defensible?

1 answer:

6 0

<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>

You might be interested in

The Earth’s ______ is important to the ongoing transformation of the surface. 1.core 2.rotation 3.crust 4.mantle

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

The Earth’s mantle is important to the ongoing transformation of the surface.

4.mantle

5 0

2 years ago

Which of the following events could have occurred as a human survival strategy during the last ice age ?

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Earliest humans to live in Europe were able to survive the last Ice Age period that was a characterized by ferocious change in the climate that covered the continent in a thick layer of ice. Stone age blacksmiths during this period survived through the masterly and use of fire to make tools as a survival strategy while old cultures died and new ones emerged over thousands of years, where the hunter-gatherer populations ebbed and flowed. The hunting of animals and gathering of wild fruit and berries eventually led to adoption of pastoral, farming cultures that arrived in Europe from the Middle East around 8,000 years ago.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What prompted the early-20th century coup in Brazil?

AnnZ [28]

The middle class attempted to over turn the coffee elite controlled government. If this helps give a brainliest :)

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did American business add to the decline the Mexican government?<br> Ak

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

Relationships within the Mexican government and American settlers in Texas begin to depreciate because settlers declined to convert to Catholicism or free their slaves.U.S. business interests created controversy because of unfair economic systems.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An example of a pull factor would be<br> A.oppression.<br> B.famine.<br> C.war.<br> D.safety.

klasskru [66]

An example of a pull factor would be SAFETY.

<h3>Further Explanation </h3>

People migrate to a new area because of many factors. These factors can be explained as pull factors and push factors.

Definition of pull factors is factors that attract some people to emigrate to an area, this factor relates to the destination area. This new place seems to have a promising future, a better job, a better environment, political stability, and a better education.

A push factor is a factor that forces them to leave the area that they were lived in. Or in another word, a factor that pushes them out from the area they were lived in. Oppression, famine, war, and unemployment are some of the push factors.

1. Oppression is a situation when an individual or a group of people treated unfairly or cruelly. These people push to leave their place to live because they no longer have the freedom and being discriminate.

2. Famine usually caused by crops failure. It's a situation when an extreme shortage of food occurred.

3. War and conflict force people to leave their home because the country they live in no longer safe for them and their family.

<h3>Learn more </h3>

Pull factors brainly.com/question/1156669

Two factors of migration brainly.com/question/1291968

Migration brainly.com/question/1558301

Keywords: pull factors, push factors, migration, factors of migration, the reason for migration

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers