Muslim Arabs are about 80 or 90 percent of the Arab population. Although Islamic, there are different sects like Shia, Alawi, Zaidi, and Sunni. Ten percent of Arabs are considered Christian or Druze.
Arabs and Islam are traced back in history. In the seventh century, Arabs received the Islam teachings of Mohammed and Islam spread to Southwest and Central Asia, North Africa, Persia, and Afghanistan, and Central Asia,
Other cultures were influenced when the Arabs invaded territories that believed in other religious teachings like Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian
Muslim Arabs invaded territories to create empires, like Umayyid dynasty that was established in 661, in Damascus in 661.
Arab rulers brought took Jews, Christians, Greeks, Persians thinkers to Baghdad to teach during the ʿAbbāsid dynasty. Some of them translated Plato and Aristotle’s literature into Arabic.
hope this helps
Answer: his tons of flesh had been only so much gossamer I think
Explanation:
For the answer to the question above, this refers to Three-Fifth Compromise where the South used the number of slaves in its territories to increase its representation. It gave the South more power by using the slave population to its advantage. This would threaten the balance of power, particularly to the Northern States.
Both, nationalism and Islamism, were ways that were used by the authorities of the newly formed countries for unification and strengthening the position of the nation, and the politicians as well.
Nationalism was based on ethnic level, and it was a way of creating despise, revolt, anger, towards the other nations. It was used as a unification method and for creating a nationalist core, and in this way the authorities were able to create a large mass of people that were willing to fight for their own nation, and had a deep hatred towards the other nations.
Islamism was based on religious level, and it was promoting unification on religious basis, but was also creating lots of hatred and aggression towards other religions. In this way, the authorities were trying to create a strong religious core in the country, but also brotherly alliances with the countries that practice the same religion.
Both, nationalism and Islamism were terrible towards the minorities, and the nationalist were killing and committing genocides on ethnic level, while the Islamist were doing the same but on religious level.
It does contradict Leahy's opinion.
Because Japanese soldiers were willing to fight to the death and even commit suicide, and their casualties were already high.
