All categories

2 years ago

EA4.

Business

1 answer:

boyakko [2]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

There is the relation between the variable cost and the product cost & fixed cost and the period cost

The product cost is that cost which is used to make the product. It includes direct material, direct labor, and the manufacturing overhead

In mathematically,

Product cost = Direct material + direct labor + manufacturing overhead

The period cost is that cost which remain fixed and is incurred when the time passes

Period cost = Salaries of sales person + delivery trucks depreciation + Repairs to office equipment + Advertising expense + usage of office supplies expense

So, the categorization is shown below:

Lumber used to construct decks ($12.00 per square foot) = Variable cost and Product cost

Carpenter labor used to construct decks ($10 per hour) = Variable cost and Product cost

Construction supervisor salary ($45,000 per year) = Fixed cost and the period cost

Depreciation on tools and equipment ($6,000 per year) = Fixed cost and the period cost

Selling and administrative expenses ($35,000 per year) = Fixed cost and the period cost

Rent on corporate office space ($34,000 per year) = Fixed cost and the period cost

Nails, glue, and other materials required to construct deck (varies per job) =

Variable cost and Product cost

You might be interested in

You bought one of Great White Shark Repellant Co.’s 8 percent coupon bonds one year ago for $1,044. These bonds make annual paym

GalinKa [24]

Answer:

17.4%

Explanation:

original purchase price 1 year ago = $1,044

current market price:

0.06 = {80 + [(1,000 - MV)/13]} / [(1,000 + MV)/2]

0.06 x [(1,000 + MV)/2] = 80 + [(1,000 - MV)/13]

0.06 x (500 + 0.5MV) = 80 + 76.92 - 0.0769MV

30 + 0.03MV = 156.92 - 0.0769MV

0.1069MV = 126.92

MV = 126.92 / 0.1069 = $1,187.28

total returns during the year = $80 (coupon) + ($1,187.28 - $1,044) = $223.28

nominal return on investment = $223.28 / $1,044 = 21.387%

real return on investment = [(1 + i) / (1 + inflation)] - 1 = [(1 + 0.21387) / (1 + 0.034)] - 1 = 1.174 - 1 = 0.174 = 17.4%

4 0

2 years ago

Trevor always begins the day with a strawberry milkshake (milk (x1 ) and strawberries(x2) mixed in proportion 1:5). His income i

jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

Going by the question that the proportion of milk and strawberry for milk shake is 1:5.

If amount of milk is to be X1 that means the quantity of strawberry (X2) will be 5×X1, i.e., X2=5X1... Equation 1

And in addition, the milk and strawberry are complementary consumables as strawberry is of no use without milk and vice versa.

Budget equation will be as follows:

P1×X1+P2×5X1=M.... Equation 2

Given M=200, P1=15 & P2=1

Putting values in Equation 2

15×X1+1×5X1=200

X1=10 & X2=50(from equation 1)

Answer a)

With change in P1 from 15 to 5

Again putting values in Equation 2

5×X1+1×5X1=200

X1=20 & X2=100.

The total change in the demand of milk will increase from 10 units to 20 units.

Answer b)

Strawberry and milk are complementary goods here for that reason there would be no effect on substitution.

Answer c)

Since there will be no effect on substitution, total effect will be equal to income effect.

7 0

2 years ago

After sugar refiner has produced fine sugar for baking purposes, what is left over is used to produce molasses. This technology

Blizzard [7]

Answer:

ECONOMIES OF SCOPE

Explanation:

Economies of Scope concept implies producing different , but related products will reduce the per unit cost of production of the firm (relatively lesser than if the products would have been produced separately.

This happens because of backward & forward linkages in interrelated but different goods' inputs & outputs .

Ex : In this case, another byproduct - molasses has been produced of waste from sugar production, which could have otherwise been purchased input.

Economies of Production is cost reduction due to quantity & not variety production. Diseconomies of Scale & Diseconomies of Scope are their opposite phenomenas leading to cost rise . So , none of these 3 are apt.

6 0

2 years ago

First National Bank charges 13.1 percent compounded monthly on its business loans. First United Bank charges 13.4 percent compou

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

EAR for First national Bank = 13.92 %

EAR for First United Bank = 13.85 %

Explanation:

given data

First National Bank charges = 13.1 percent

compounded monthly , 1 year = 12 month

First United Bank charges = 13.4 percent

compounded semiannually , 1 year = 2 semiannually

solution

we get here first EAR for First national Bank that is express as

EAR for First national Bank = $(1+ \frac{r}{n} )^n - 1$ .....................1

here r is rate and n is month

so put here value

EAR for First national Bank = $(1+ \frac{0.131}{12} )^{12} - 1$

EAR for First national Bank = 13.92 %

and

EAR for First United Bank is

EAR for First United Bank = $(1+ \frac{r}{n} )^n - 1$ ..................2

here r is rate and n is semi annually

EAR for First United Bank = $(1+ \frac{0.134}{2} )^2 - 1$

EAR for First United Bank = 13.85 %

here First United bank EAR is less

5 0

2 years ago

Portman Industries just paid a dividend of $2.16 per share. The company expects the coming year to be very profitable, and its d

Mariana [72]

Answer:

Expected Dividend Yield is 10.4%

Explanation:

As we know that the Expected Dividend Yield for Portman’s Stock can be calculated using the following formula:

Expected Dividend Yield = [D0 x (1 + g) / Intrinsic Value (Step1)] * 100

Here

Dividend just paid is $2.16 per share

The growth rate for the Portman's stock is 16% for the first year

Ke is 13.6%

Intrinsic Value = $24.09 (See Step 1)

By putting the above values in the above equation, we have:

Expected Dividend Yield = [$2.16 x (1 + 0.16) / $24.09] x 100

= 10.4%

Step 1. Intrinsic Value can be calculated using the following formula:

Intrinsic Value = D1 / (1 + r)^1 + Horizon Value (Step 2) / (1 + r)^1

Here

Growth (g) will be 3.2% for the year 2 because D2 = D1 * (1 + g)

Horizon value = D1 * (1 + g) / (Ke – g) = $2.5056 * (1 + 3.2%) / (13.6% – 3.2%)

= $2.5858 / 0.0752 = $24.86 per share

So by putting the above values in the step 1, we have:

= $2.5056 / (1 + 0.136)1 + $24.86/(1 + 0.136)1

= $24.09 per share

3 0

2 years ago