answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klasskru [66]
2 years ago
14

Three people have identical rights but unequal shares in a property, share an indivisible interest, and may sell or transfer the

ir interest without consent of the others.
What type of ownership is this?
Business
1 answer:
Softa [21]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

joint tenancy

Explanation:

joint tenancy is the coming together of two or more persons for the purpose of owning a property. they have identical rights, unequal shares in a property, share an indivisible interest

You might be interested in
We are evaluating a project that costs $1.68 million, has a six-year life, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is
zvonat [6]

Answer:

                              Best-Case        Worst-Case

                                  NPV                     NPV

PV of cash inflows $2,897,706      $3,187,477

PV of project cost  $1,680,000     $1,848,000 ($1,680,000 * 1.1)

NPV                         $1,217,706    $1,339,477

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Initial project cost = $1.68 million

Project's estimated life = 6 years

Salvage value = $0

Depreciation expense = $280,000 ($1.68 million/6)

Income Statement:

Sales revenue (90,000 * $37.95) = $3,415,500

Cost of goods sold:

Variable cost (90,000 * $23.20) =    2,088,000

Gross profit =                                    $1,327,500

Fixed costs =                                         815,000

Income before tax =                           $512,500

Income tax (21% of $512,500) =          107,625

Net income =                                     $404,875

Add depreciation expense                280,000

Annual cash inflows =                      $684,875

PV annuity factor for 6 years at 11% = 4.231

PV of annual cash inflows of $684,875= $2,897,706 ($684,875 * 4.231)

Annual cash inflows = $753,363 ($684,875 * 1.1)

PV of annual cash inflows of $753,363 = $3,187,477 ($753,363 * 4.231)

3 0
2 years ago
Laserscope Inc. is trying to determine the best combination of short-term and long-term debt to employ in financing its assets.
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

Laserscope Inc.

Return on Equity (ROE):

= $1,466,400/$18,000,000 * 100

= 8.15%

Explanation:

a) Laserscope's Return on Equity (ROE) is a financial performance measure, calculated by dividing the net income or Earnings After Tax (EAT) by its total shareholders' equity.  It is usually expressed as a percentage.  So the above calculation is further multiplied by 100.

b) Data and Calculations:

Current assets = $16

Fixed assets = $20

Total assets = $36

Debt ratio = 50%  of $36 million = $18 million

Therefore, Stockholders' equity = 50% (1 - 50%) or $18 million

EBIT = $4.1 million

Short-term debt = $6 million

Long-term debt = $12 million

Interest on short-term debt = $420,000 (7% * $6 million)

Interest on long-term debt = $1,236,000 (10.3% * $12 million)

Total interest expense = $1,656,000

Earnings before interest and taxes = $4,100,000

Interest expense                                   1,656,000

Earnings before taxes                          2,444,000

Company tax (40%)                                (977,600)

Earnings after taxes (EAT)                 $1,466,400

7 0
2 years ago
The law firm of Furlan and Benson accumulates costs associated with individual cases, using a job order cost system. The followi
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

3-Jul

Dr Work in process 25,500

Cr Salaries payable 25,500

10-Jul

Dr Work in process 12,500

Cr Cash 12,500

14-Jul

Dr Work in process 48,100

Cr Salaries payable 48,100

18-Jul

Dr Work in process 30,000

Cr Consultant fees payable 30,000

27-Jul

Dr Work in process 26,660

Cr Office overhead 26,660

31-Jul

Dr Office overhead 28,500

Cr Cash 28,500

31-Jul

Dr office overhead 4,000

Cr Supplies 4,000

31-Jul

Dr Salaries payable 74,350

Cr Cash 74,350

31-Jul

Dr Accounts receivable 172,500

Cr Fees earned 172,500

31-Jul

Dr Cost of services 142,760

Cr Work in process 142,760

b. $5,840 Over applied

c. Gross profit $35,580

Explanation:

Furlar and Benson General Journal

3-Jul

Dr Work in process 25,500

(170 hours ×150 per hour)

Cr Salaries payable 25,500

10-Jul

Dr Work in process 12,500

Cr Cash 12,500

14-Jul

Dr Work in process 48,100

(260 hours ×185 per hour)

Cr Salaries payable 48,100

18-Jul

Dr Work in process 30,000

Cr Consultant fees payable 30,000

27-Jul

Dr Work in process 26,660

(170 hours +260 hours)*62

Cr Office overhead 26,660

31-Jul

Dr Office overhead 28,500

Cr Cash 28,500

31-Jul

Dr office overhead 4,000

Cr Supplies 4,000

31-Jul

Dr Salaries payable 74,350

Cr Cash 74,350

31-Jul

Dr Accounts receivable 172,500

Cr Fees earned 172,500

31-Jul

Dr Cost of services 142,760

(25,500+12,500+48,100+30,000+26,660)

Cr Work in process 142,760

b. Calculation for how much office overhead isover- or underapplied

(28,500+4,000)-26,660

=32,500-26,660

=$5,840

Therefore the office overhead is over applied with $5,840

C. Calculation to Determine the gross profit on the Obsidian case

Fees earned 172,500

Less Cost of services (136,920)

(142,760-5,840)

Gross profit $35,580

Therefore the gross profit on the Obsidian case, assuming that over- or underapplied office overhead is closed monthly to cost of services will be $35,580

5 0
2 years ago
Wally and Sally want to go into business together and plan on offering a tutoring service to high school and college students. W
sashaice [31]

Answer:

A. Yes, because the corporation would be required to pay tax on its profits, and the shareholders would also be required to pay taxes on dividends

4 0
2 years ago
Please describe the circumstances of the following case study and recommend a course of action. Explain your approach to the pro
Cloud [144]

Answer:

In this case, an analyst is presented with recommending the best option between internal production and external acquisition of  goods (outsourcing) for resale.  Through relevant quantitative and qualitative analyses it will be decided whether the company should make or buy the engines or vacuums.  To make 50,000 units of the engines, production costs will be incurred as given in the question.

After considering the qualitative factors, including availability of production capacity, space, and labor, the next would be to undertake a  costs /benefits quantitative analysis of making the engines in-house versus buying from outside for resale.  The outcomes are then compared to understand their financial effects.  The option that makes better financial sense or that is more profitable should be chosen because the payoff outweighs the other and the company's assets and stockholders will be better off with the more profitable option, either in the direction of making more profits or reducing the cost profile.

In any make or buy decision situation, the costs that are relevant are the costs that change with the option.  Any costs that do not change with a chosen option is disregarded.  This include items like depreciation and other indirect fixed costs.

b) Computations:

1. To make:

Description                    Cost per Month

Direct Materials                    $75,000

Direct Labor                        $100,000

Variable factory overhead $375,000 ($7.50 x 50,000)

Total variable costs =        $550,000

Selling price =                 $7,500,000 ($150 x 50,000)

Contribution =                $6,950,000

Fixed factory overhead     $150,000 (150% of $100,000)

Net Income                    $6,800,000

2. To buy:

Cost of goods  - $3,000,000

Selling price       $7,500,000

Contribution      $4,500,000

Fixed costs            $112,500 (75% of $150,000)

Net Income       $4,387,500

c) The company should go ahead and produce the engines internally.  This is far more profitable, all quantitative factors considered.

Explanation:

In arriving at a decision in a make or buy decision situation, only relevant costs that change with the option should be analysed.  Fixed indirect costs and depreciation should not be considered.

From the above quantitative analyses, the company will make a contribution (profit) of $6.95 million instead of $4.5 million if it chooses to make the engines internally.

Even a review of the bottomline (after factoring in the fixed costs) shows that the company would make a net income of $6.8 million by producing the engines in-house.  The net income above the buy option is more than $2 million.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Deydey620
    5·2 answers
  • ​julio's term paper is due on thursday at 5 p.m. on wednesday, he asks his professor if he can turn it in on friday morning, to
    6·1 answer
  • On the demand side of GDP, consumption by _____________ is the largest component of GDP, accounting for about two-thirds of the
    5·1 answer
  • A firm is experiencing a loss of $5,000 per year. The firm has fixed costs of $8,000 per year.a. Should the firm operate in the
    6·1 answer
  • Country X has currency C1 and Country Y has currency C2. The nominal exchange rate C2/C1 and GDP deflator P for Country X and P*
    12·1 answer
  • Ashley, a purchasing manager, tells Franklin, the human resource manager, that she has selected a candidate to be her purchasing
    8·1 answer
  • An investment project has an initial cost of $382 and cash flows $105, $130, $150, and $150 for Years 1 to 4, respectively. The
    15·1 answer
  • Schweser Satellites Inc. produces satellite earth stations that sell for $100,000 each. The firms fixed costs, F, are $2 million
    5·1 answer
  • he following is a partially completed lower section of a departmental expense allocation spreadsheet for Brickland. It reports t
    7·1 answer
  • Lancelot Manufacturing is a small textile manufacturer using machinehours as the single indirectcost rate to allocate manufactur
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!