A person's right when executing freedom of speech :
- That person has the right to voice their opinion and point of view regarding the conflict
A person responsibility when executing freedom of speech :
- Restraint him/herself from the resort of violence
- Freedom of speech does not justify using offensive words to his/her speaking partner
Hello. This question is incomplete. Full question is:
Read the fictitious killer Robot case found at the web site for the Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science.
The case begins with the incitement of a programmer for manslaughter for writing a faulty code that resulted in the death of a robot operator. Slowly, over the course of many articles, you are introduced to several factors within the corporation that contributed to the accident. Read the case and answer the following questions:
Responsibility for an accident is rarely defined clearly and is often difficult to trace to one or two people or causes. In this fictitious case, it is clear that a large number of people share responsibility for the accident. Identify all the people you think were at least partially responsible for the death of Bart Matthews, and explain why you think so.
Answer and Explanation:
When reading the case indicated in the question above, we can see that it is a case where a poorly programmed industrial robot killed its operator. In this case, we can point out that the programmers of this robot are the first culprits. This is because the robot in question exhibited a violent and dangerous behavior that could have been avoided with correct programming and effective tests. This shows that the programmers did not have enough knowledge and experience to work on this project. This makes us able to point out other culprits that is the company that hired the programmers called Silicon Techtronics, as well as the manager and responsible for the project because it had the obligation to assess the degree of professionalism of the programmers, as well as ensuring the safety of employees.
Answer:
C. Moral rights
Explanation:
The ethical decison could be classified into various types according to what it entails. For example, when a manufacturer tends to cut back employees'hour and pay rather than sacking them, this ethical decision rule showed moral rights.
Because, the employer considered the families of his employees and the responsibilities which they have hence the reason why he didn't sack them.
Answer:
Cantor the salesman,
1. probed Doris to know the state of her finances in a casual manner,
2. created fear in her by telling her of the possibility of dealing with the IRS and later,
3. went upfront in asking her about her card details.
Explanation:
In episode 680, of Anatomy of a scam, we learn about skills employed by salesmen to elicit delicate information from their prospects. Cantor, a seasoned salesman employs this tactics in his phone conversation with Doris. To know the state of her finances, Cantor probed Doris for delicate information like the amount of savings she had and the mortgage she owes. Because he was relaxed in asking these questions. Doris was more wiling to open up.
In trying to get her to pay the membership fee, he presented a likely problem which he explained joining the business would help her solve. When he wanted to extract the details from her debit card for payment, he went upfront in requesting them.
The answer in the space provided is 1992, as the presidential
candidate responsible with the whiteboard that displays a reminder to the
campaign staffers that the economy is stupid was during the year 1992 and the
presidential candidate is Bill Clinton.
