Answer:
The answer to this question is given below in the explanation section
Explanation:
In this question, a scenario is given about inferencing information from the given data. The data that is given in the question about the percentage of US Homes with Electricity and it is depicted in the bar-graph as attached to this solution.
In this scenario, Which statement is supported by the information presented in the chart?
People owned fewer electrical appliances in the 1920s than in earlier decades.
More rural homes than urban homes had access to electricity in the 1920s. The number of houses with electricity would decrease after the 1930s.
Demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s.
The correct answer to this question is 3, that is the demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s in rural and urban.
<span>At present (as of 2017 statistics), the national childhood obesity rate is 18.5 percent. The percentage of children who evidence obesity rises as children get older. The obesity rate for 12- to 19-year-olds (middle school through high school) is 20.6%.
Dietary habits have a large role in children's weight issues, and what is available at schools influences what children and teens will eat and drink. As a</span> January, 2011 article published in the J<em>ournal of Adolescent Health </em>asserted: "Schools are in a powerful position to influence children’s diets; therefore attention to foods sold in them is necessary in order to try to improve children’s diets." You could look for that article for more information. It's titled, "Foods Sold in School Vending Machines are Associated with Overall Student Dietary Intake," by Alisha J. Rovner<span>, </span>Tonja R. Nansel<span>, </span>Jing Wang<span>, and </span><span>Ronald J. Iannotti.</span>
Slave labor was needed, they needed people to plant those cash crops for them.
Answer:
It keeps soldiers upbeat.
It helps soldiers continue fighting.
It helps soldiers overcome the harsh realities and challenges of war.
It is used in attacks when infantry attacks would be impractical.
Explanation:
on edg
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.
I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
