answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
1 year ago
8

What problems do Mchanagma and Verdirame see with the current state of human rights in the international system in their article

"The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation?"
History
1 answer:
sineoko [7]1 year ago
8 0

Answer and Explanation:

Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”

We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.

The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.

They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is  buy cover for dictatorships ”

Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.

To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.

You might be interested in
One factor that contributed to the decline of both great zimbabwe and the mayans was
slava [35]
<span>The empire became to large for the available resources. The people and the animals grew at an alarming rate. The capacity of the land area to supply crops, kindling, brushing and every single other need of life. Since the Great Zimbabwe individuals did not have the innovation to transport adequate supplies over long separations, the main option would have been to scatter the general population.</span>
7 0
2 years ago
1. Contrast the reasoning of the Drago Doctrine with the thinking that supports the Roosevelt Corollary. With which do you agree
marin [14]

The Monroe Doctrine stated that any form of European intervention in the American continent would be viewed as a form of aggression and it would require the intervention of the United States.

The Roosevelt Corollary was coined to justify the military intervention of the United States in Latin America in protection of the former's economic interests. Latin Americans resented this unilateral claim of authority, and in 1907 the Drago Doctrine was incorporated into international law. Coined by the Argentinian Luis Drago, it prohibited armed interventions of any county to any country to collect debts.

7 0
2 years ago
Explain the causes of the expansion of Muslim rule; how and where did it expand before 1450?
Sever21 [200]

Answer:

The Arab Empire starts conquering vast territories, which led to the emergence of the Islamic religion.

Explanation:

Islam spread through military conquest, trade, pilgrimage, and missionaries. In the west and north Africa, Islam began to spread during the 9th century. The Muslim conquest affects Europe by the capture of several states. The Moors dominated the Iberian Peninsula from 711 until 1492 and the Muslims rule the Island of Sicily. In the 11th century, Europe launched a series of holy wars, known as the Crusades. Their goal was to retake Jerusalem and the surrounding Holy Land from Muslim control. After the four crusades, Christians lost the war.

It expanded in Iberian peninsula, Africa, Sicily, Byzantine and Sasanian empires.  

6 0
2 years ago
Photographers, novelists, and other artists who depicted working-class city life,
Sloan [31]

Answer:

B. naturalism

3 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
4. What are the most convincing reasons for not prosecuting Nixon?
Savatey [412]

Answer:

The main reasons for not prosecuting Nixon would be to save the country further embarrassment and to prevent further division.  Our country was at a very low point then.  Drawing out the process would have only made things worse in the long run.

Hope this helped! :)

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • "slave trade in West Africa was organized as department of a state"justify this statement in relation to the great circuit.
    8·1 answer
  • how have developed western countries affected non western nations during the modern period? Explain how three political, economi
    11·2 answers
  • some African nations, the end of European colonial rule brought about political instability. Many countries were not able to est
    7·2 answers
  • What was Hugo predicting when he wrote “pushing out under every kingdom of Europe”? Please help me? Thank you so much! :)
    5·2 answers
  • A fundamental principle of a republican form of government is that
    6·1 answer
  • 13.MED. CLOSE SHOT – PETE VAN HORN 13. A tall, thin man who is seen standing in front of his house. VAN HORN I'll cut through th
    15·2 answers
  • Most people make a living in the eastern third of the country by _____.
    11·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Section 6 of the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. Every common carrier subject to the provisions of this a
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following explains a significant positive impact that the immigration of large populations of Chinese people had on
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about US mobilization during World War II are true? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!