answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
2 years ago
10

Bay City Mining, Inc. has a price of $20 a share, outstanding shares of 2.5 million, retained earnings of $1 million dollars, an

d a dividend yield of 2 percent.
It has a price-earnings ratio of:

a. 50, which is high by historical standards.
b. 50, which is low by historical standards.
c. 25, which is high by historical standards.
d. 25, which is low by historical standards.
Business
1 answer:
weqwewe [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. 50, which is high by historical standards.

Explanation:

a. 50, which is high by historical standards.

It is high because  current price  is high than earnings.

Earning yield is  the reciprocal of price earning ratio that is = 1/ (P/E ratio) expressed as a percentage.

So

PRice Earning ratio = Market price per share/ Earning per share

Price Earning ration= $20/ 0.4 = 50

Earning per share= Earnings/ No of shares outstanding

EPS= $ 1 million/$ 2.5 million = 0.4

You might be interested in
Rachel lives and works on her father’s dairy farm as a large animal veterinarian. The farm does not employ any outside workers.
tatiyna

Answer:

D. No, because Rachel's family farm does not employ outside workers.

Explanation:

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 in its most rudimentary form is a law in the United States meant to govern the occupational health and safety of federal government employees and the private sector as well.

Option D is correct because the law does not cover immediate family members on farms that do not employ outside employees.

6 0
2 years ago
Seller Wanda told her broker Chad that she wants to clear $75,000.00 when she sells her home. Chad took the listing and sold the
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer: Chad took an illegal listing

Explanation:

From the question, we are informed that Seller Wanda told her broker Chad that she wants to clear $75,000.00 when she sells her home and that Chad took the listing and sold the home for $150,000 and gave Wanda her $75,000.00 and he kept the other $75,000.00.

In this scenario, Chad took an illegal listing. Wanda has the right to know the amount that the home was sold. All written offers should have been sent to Wanda for her to review.

6 0
2 years ago
The Camel Company produces 10,000 units of item Roto 454 annually at a total cost of $190,000.
Nitella [24]

Answer:

$175,000

Explanation:

Given that,

Direct materials = $ 20,000

Direct labor = $55,000

Variable overhead = $45,000

Fixed overhead = $70,000

Number of units offered = 10,000

Rent Revenue = $15,000

Avoidable Fixed Overhead:

= Fixed overhead per unit × Number of units offered

= $4 × 10,000

= $40,000

Relevant Costs:

= Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Variable Overhead + Avoidable Fixed Overhead + Rent Revenue

= $20,000  + $55,000  + $45,000  + $40,000 + $15,000

= $175,000

6 0
2 years ago
Shaniqua s restaurant utilizes a contribution margin pricing system. She would like the selling price of a new menu item she is
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Her kitchen Staff can spend up to $3.00 on product cost.

Explanation:

Selling price= $10.00

Margin= $4.00

Labor costs = $10.00*30% = $3.00

Selling Price = Contribition margin + Labor costs + Product Cost.

Isolating Product cost from the equation:

Product cost = Selling price - (Contribution margin + Labor costs)

Product cost = $ 10.00 - ($4.00 + $3.00)

Product cost = $ 10.00 - $7.00

Product cost = $ 3.00

The max. amount that kitchen staff can spend on product cost is: $ 3.00

7 0
2 years ago
What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is p
dem82 [27]

Answer:

a. The present value of the sales price is $1.657 million.

b. No. This is because an investment in the property will result in a negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million.

c-1. The present value of the future cash flows is $2.122 million.

c-2. Yes. Yes. This is because an investment in the property will result in a positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore presented before answering the question as follows:

You can buy property today for $2.1 million and sell it in 6 years for $3.1 million. (You earn no rental income on the property.)

a. If the interest rate is 11%, what is the present value of the sales price? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

b. Is the property investment attractive to you?

c-1. What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is paid at the end of each year. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

c-2. Is the property investment attractive to you now?

The explanation to the answers is now provided as follows:

a. If the interest rate is 11%, what is the present value of the sales price? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

The present value of the sales price can be calculated using the simple present value formula as follows:

PV = FV / (1 + r)^n ……………………….. (1)

Where;

PV = Present value of the sales price = ?

FV = Future value or the sales price in 6 years = $3.1 million

r = interest rate = 11%, or 0.11

n = number of years = 6

Substitute the values into equation (1), we have:

PV = $3.1 / (1 + 0.11)^6

PV = $3.1 / 1.11^6

PV = $3.1 / 1.870414552161

PV = $1.65738659187525 million

Rounding to 3 decimal places, we have:

PV = $1.657 million

Therefore, the present value of the sales price is $1.657 million.

b. Is the property investment attractive to you?

No. This is because an investment in the property will result in a negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million.

The negative net present value (NPV) of $0.443 million is determined as follows:

NPV = Present value of the sales price - Acquisition cost = $1.657 million - $2.1 million = -$0.443 million

c-1. What is the present value of the future cash flows, if you also could earn $110,000 per year rent on the property? The rent is paid at the end of each year. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 3 decimal places.)

The present value of the future cash flows can be calculated using the following steps:

<u>Step 1: Calculation of the present value of the $110,000 per year rent</u>

Since the rent is paid at end of each year, this can be calculated using the formula for calculating the present value of an ordinary annuity as follows:

PVR = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) …………………………………. (2)

Where;

PVR = Present value of yearly rent = ?

P = Annual rent =$110,000

r = interest rate = 11%, or 0.11

n = number of years = 6

Substitute the values into equation (2) to have:

PVR = $110,000 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.11))^6) / 0.11)

PVR = $110,000 * 4.23053785373826

PVR = $465,359.163911209

Converting to million and rounded to 3 decimal places, we have:

PVR = $0.465 million

<u>Step 2: Calculation of the present value of the future cash flows</u>

Present value of future cash flows = Present value sales price + Present value of annual rent ……. (3)

Where;

Present value sales price = $1.657 million, as already calculate in part a above

Present value of annual rent = PVR = $0.465 million

Substituting the values into equation (3), we have:

Present value of future cash flows = $1.657 million + $0.465 million = $2.122 million

Therefore, the present value of the future cash flows is $2.122 million.

c-2. Is the property investment attractive to you now?

Yes. This is because an investment in the property will result in a positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million.

The positive net present value (NPV) of $0.022 million is determined as follows:

NPV = Present value of tof the future cash flows - Acquisition cost = $2.122 million - $2.1 million = 0.0219999999999998 million

Converting to million and rounded to 3 decimal places, we have:

NPV = $0.022 million

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The ____ structure is considered the simplest and the oldest form of organizational structure.
    5·1 answer
  • Do you believe initiative is an important quality? Defend your answer.
    5·2 answers
  • Journey's the shoe store has a cost of goods sold of $22.00 on classic Converse Chuck Taylor sneakers. The corporate office mand
    13·1 answer
  • The journal entry to issue $ 600 of direct materials and $ 40 of indirect materials to production involves​ debit(s) to the​ ___
    11·1 answer
  • A company that usually sells satellite TV equipment for $50 and two years of satellite TV service for $450 has a special, time-l
    11·1 answer
  • At Mayflower &amp; Juneberry, a garden supply store, buyers need to keep abreast of the latest landscaping trends and order each
    13·1 answer
  • Lonergan, Inc., a calendar year S corporation in Athens, Georgia, had a balance in AAA of $200,000 and AEP of $110,000 on Decemb
    13·1 answer
  • Per Chevron’s 3Q 2013 filing, what was the percentage change in the cost of purchased oil products when comparing nine months en
    10·1 answer
  • Day Interiors is considering a project with the following cash flows. What is the IRR of this project?
    10·1 answer
  • Jamari conducts a business with the following results in 2020: Revenue $20,000 Depreciation on car 3,960 Operating expenses of c
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!