Answer:
No
Explanation:
When we do research, it is important to keep confidentiality regarding the personal data from the persons we interview. In other words, we are not supposed to tell other people "who said what" or to publish our results with the names of the people (if we're publishing a paper).
In this case, Sara conducted a study in her sixth grade classroom about interests in science classes, later she shared what individual students said with the seventh-grade teachers. Therefore, she shared confidential information when she told the teacher what individual students said. Therefore, Sara wasn't sharing this information in accordance with ethical research practices.
Answer:
Nola and Charles Collusion at Trident, IA.
Helping or Impeding Scenarios:
Helping Scenarios:
4. Nola and Charles are regulars at the same coffee house. They talk regularly
5. Charles and Nola both charge a fixed per person price for a party
Impeding Scenarios:
1. Charles develops a signature appetizer that becomes the must have in Trident
2. A party planning school opens and the new graduates are ready to plan!
3. Nola lowers her price on national television
6. Nola's marginal cost is lower than Charles's.
7. Most of the parties are given by Trident's largest employer, a water bottling plant.
Explanation:
Nola and Charles can only enter a collusion agreement secretly because it is illegal. Since the agreement is secret, it is not enforceable in the court of law. The tendency for Nola and Charles to be entangled in the prisoner's dilemma is very high. It is also not possible for them to protect their collusion for very long because they have different cost bases and core competencies that derail collusion on a sustainable large scale. Graduates of party organization and other market participants, including the large firm that hosts most of the parties in the area will end the collusion before long.
If 97% came from domestic sources then 3% came from foreign sources. This means that $450,000 is 3/100 of the total amount. You need to divide 450,000 by 3 to get 1/100 (1%) of the total amount, then multiply that number by 100 to give you the sum of 100/100 (100%) of the company's revenues:
450,000/3=150,000×100= $15,000,000
So, the company made $15,000,000 last year
Answer: Pluralistic organization
Explanation: Pluralistic organization is an organization that is made up of diverse group of people,it may include people of different race, gender, Sociocultural background and makes efforts to ensure that they maintain harmony,pluralistic organization is essential for global Integration and it is practiced by most international organization like the United Nations, World health organization and business entities.
Complete Question:
Rashad consistently went above and beyond to meet his personal deadlines and to help other team members to ensure a recent product launch was completed on time. His manager was impressed and offered Rashad the opportunity for a coveted leadership position on the next generation product team. The manager's action is consistent with _______ justice.
Group of answer choices.
A. restorative
B. customary
C. distributive
D. frontier
E. reparative
Answer:
Distributive.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Rashad consistently went above and beyond to meet his personal deadlines and to help other team members to ensure a recent product launch was completed on time. As a result of this, his manager was impressed and offered Rashad the opportunity for a coveted leadership position on the next generation product team. The manager's action is consistent with distributive justice.
Distributive justice can be defined as the just and fair allocation of resources among a large group of people. It is mainly focused on the use of discretion as opposed to administrative laws, policies or procedures.
<em>Hence, Rashad was offered the much coveted position by his manager not because he was entitled to it by law but as a result of distributive justice being used by the manager. </em>
