Answer:
d. Vygotsky's concept of the zone of proximal development
Explanation:
Zone of proximal development: In psychology, the term "zone of proximal development" is also written as ZPD, and it was proposed by a social constructivist and soviet psychologist named Lev Vygotsky.
According to Vygotsky, it is described as the difference between the capability of a learner or a child to perform a particular task with the help of another person or guidance or without the help of anyone i.e, by oneself.
In the question above, the given statement signifies Vygotsky's concept of the zone of proximal development.
Answer:
Oklahoma Supreme Court
Explanation:
In Oklahoma, there are two courts; the court of criminal appeals makes judgement on criminal matters while Court of civil appeals makes the decision on civil matters. The Oklahoma supreme court makes the final decision on all matters.
Aimee's case is a civil issue, I she is not satisfied with Court of Civil Appeals decision, she can move the Oklahoma Supreme court for final decision.
With regard to the culture clashes in different nations and communities, use of the contact hypothesis theory could help to ease tensions.
In the contact hypothesis theory, which is credited to Gordon Allport, is the ability for two or more cultures to coexist peacefully through meaningful and thoughtful interaction in order to reduce prejudice. To ensure successful contact, it is recommended that: both groups receive equal status of importance with minimal differences in characteristics, backgrounds, and qualities; groups work towards achieving a common goal which is equally beneficial to both groups; there is cooperation from all subjects in each group; support from local authorities of laws/government and customs; personal interaction between members of opposing groups.
Potential outcomes for successful tourist-host contact include: relaxed attitudes, understanding, a mutual appreciation for the opposing culture's values, positive interactions wherein cultures are respected mutually, increased active communication to ensure both parties are satisfied and can co-exist peacefully, and perceiving the opposing culture as equally important.
Location- It is nearby
Human Environmental Impact- Roads make easy access
Regions- There are no large hills
Movement- My movement is slow and calm, therefore safe
Place- The environment of the place is calm and doesn't have that many people
Answer: The investigator are wrong to be confident in their arrest because their is no perfect match in the finger print of the person been arrested and the one gotten from the crime scene. Because their have failed to compare the finger prints pattern seen in their records, to the one gotten from the crime scene.
The investigators are wrong in their arrest because one finger that has a whorl and loop fingerprint pattern cannot produce two different finger print pattern, which was gotten from the crime scene.
Another reason why the investigator are incorrect with their arrest is because, the crime record of the man arrested is very different from the crime committed. They should have traced the people with similar crime records, that has a similar finger prints with the one gotten from the scene.
