Answer:
This discussion is an example of the second step of the ABCD model which is the "BALANCE RESOURCES" step.
Explanation:
The ABCD model of risk management consists of the following four steps to reducing risk;
a) Assess the situation
b) Balance Resources
c) Communicate
d) Do and Debrief
In this case, there is an ongoing discussion on how to get back to the barracks as safely as possible.
Options are suggested which include taking a taxi, walking or getting a designated driver from the club. This is the second step of the model where resources are balanced and possible options are suggested and weighed to prevent and expose errors.
There are two cases to this, Where teenagers were considered future leaders,One is supportive and others are non-supportive a child prodigy and independence leads to the growth of a leader.Supportive, there are teenagers might have supportive from there friends,family would find child to be special kid. Growing teenagers there friends become even more caring and be with him till he succeed.Non-Supportive, this young teenager is become successful out of no where, poor family, competitive society and event full dedication. They have no one but the nature and the streets they become a great leaders, It is hard to convincingly say whether is he a great leader or a leader out on a lie. Humans have the tendency to to snub other people society gives a very hard time because it is an ingenious negative thoughts.
Explanation:
- Society in the past did not let future leaders coming from untouchables.
- American to be know as a free country is because, lets them be a leader.
- Teenagers with supportive background and a caring family.
- They become a great leader.
- Non-Supportive become great leaders but not as successful as supportive.
- Society treats teenagers as a nobody because it think they cant do it.
- Society would love leaders who would serve them well.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Explanation:
Let's discard one by one.
Option A.
He should create a new diagnosis and inform the authors of the DSM-5.
Why not: Diagnostic labels cannot be created from one particular case. A psychiatrist or clinical psychologist is not entitled to create or formulate a personality disorder just because he/she feels like it.
Option B.
He should diagnose the client with Unspecified Personality Disorder (UPD)
Why not: In the DSM-5 the diagnosis of unspecified personality disorder is made only to enhance the specificity of an existing personality disorder.
Option C.
He should diagnose a different condition such as depression or anxiety as a "place holder" until the true nature of the personality problems is more fully understood.
Why not: T<u>his course of action is not ethical. Clinicians must not misdiagnose patients just because they feel like it. Diagnosing a patient with depression or anxiety without them falling within the diagnostic criteria is medical negligence. </u>
In conclusion, the correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Answer: Matrix
Explanation:
Matrix structure is the structure in the form of grid where employee or workers report to one or more leader.Employee tend combine for working across their department along with performing operations in their own department in an organization.
According to the question, matrix structure should be used by defense contractor as he want reporting and link across the department for the project.
