<em>Answer:</em>
<em>observer effect </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the observer effect is described as a phenomenon in which there's a possibility that a specific act or behavior of observation might affect the different properties of the thing (what) is being observed. Therefore, it can reflect effects depending on an entirely different nature utilizing a specific mechanism and context.</em>
<em>In other words,</em><em> it refers to the act of observation that can influence a particular phenomenon that is being observed.</em>
<em><u>The correct answer is observer effect.</u></em>
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
The statistical syllogism is also called a non-deductive syllogism. This process argues in using the inductive reasoning for generalization. It is true for a particular case.
This procedure used the syllogism like most, frequently and never and rarely. It has its statistical generalizations it has one or two premises.
Premises is a generalization and argument that is used to conclude the generalization. Premises can be true and the conclusion can be wrong but it happened rarely.
Thus Zia has used here statistical syllogism for different subjects.
The answer is D.
<span>If a meeting served a social rather than a task function, the type of meeting would be a ritual activity. A social meeting is classified to a ritual activity. A ritual activity is a series of activities that includes words, gestures, and objects that are done in an appropriate place, and done in relation to set of a sequence.</span>
The answer would be Common Law Tradition. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The correct answer is that what Jenna can conduct to investigate this claim is survey and focus groups.
Explanation:
This two different approaches of collecting data can be the easier way for Jenna to collect the information necessary for it.
