All categories

2 years ago

Which of the following statements is not true of a strategic inflection point?

Business

1 answer:

Elanso [62]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct anwer is E) A new CEO is an example of a strategic inflection point.

Explanation:

The statement that "A new CEO is an example of a strategic inflection point" is false since to determine a strategic inflection point we rely on other factors that affect companies such as the power of competitors, the power of customers, the power of potential competitors, the power of suppliers and the power of substitutes.

For example, if my product or service is exceeded 10 times more by the competition in quality or price; we are talking about a strategic inflection point.

You might be interested in

Marjorie Knaus, an architect, organized Knaus Architects on January 1, 2018. During the month, Knaus Architects completed the fo

melamori03 [73]

<u>The Unadjusted Balance of Trial Balance is $82,350.</u>

<u>The Net Income for January 2018 is $21,300.</u>

Further Explanation:

1. and 2.

Please refer to attached Table: (1) for T-accounts and their balances.

For computation of Unadjusted Balance of Trial Balance, please refer to attached Table: (2)

The balance of unadjusted trial balance is $82,350.

For computation of Net Income for January 2018, please refer to attached Table: (3)

The net income for January 2018 is $21,300.

Learn More:

1. Learn more about the goal of the budget

brainly.com/question/1226004

2. Learn more about the profit margins

brainly.com/question/10218300

3. Learn more about the large expenditure

brainly.com/question/7744644

Answer details:

Grade: Middle School

Subject: Accounting

Chapter: Journal Entry and Trial Balance

Keywords: T- Account transactions, net profit, net loss, journal entry, trial balance, ledger accounts, unadjusted balance, miscellaneous expenses, rent expense, blue print expense, salary expense, automobile expense, prepaid expenses, supplies, accounts receivable, accounts payable, equipment, notes payable, common stock, professional fee, cash account, other ledger accounts, debit balance credit balance.

5 0

2 years ago

Bypassing regular sales channels in favor of Internet retailing can have strong appeal if it A. D) includes partnering rather th

jolli1 [7]

Answer:

Option A.

Includes partnering rather than competing with existing distributors

Explanation:

Through internet retailing, a business can partner with other distributors and enlist the products of the distributors on their website along side their products.They can charge a fee for each product sold via their platform, which can serve as additional revenue to the business, without much extra costs. This is because the platform is already available.

This is the business model that companies such as Amazon apply. They enlist products of other businesses on their online platform, sell them and make some profit for themselves.

This is what gives internet retailing a strong appeal.

5 0

2 years ago

What is the value today of $4,400 per year, at a discount rate of 8.3 percent, if the first payment is received 6 years from tod

Pepsi [2]

Answer:

Present Value = $290.20

Explanation:

The present value of a future payment can be calculated with the following formula:

PV = FV / (1 + i)N

Where i is the annual interest rate or discount rate, and t is the number of years until the payment will be received.

PV = Present Value = ?

FV = Payment = $4,400

i = 8.3% = 0.083

N = 20 - 6 = 14

PV = $4400 / (1 + 0.083)(20 - 6)

PV = $4400 / (1.083 * 14)

PV = $4400 / 15.162

PV = $290.1992

Present Value = $290.20 (Approximated)

4 0

2 years ago

Explain the role of cognitive shortcomings in the WorldCom fraud and how social and organizational pressures influenced Betty Vi

bulgar [2K]

Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.

* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.

Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false

6 0

2 years ago

On June 2, 2021, Tabitha Co. purchased a franchise for $586,000 by signing a five-year contract. At the end of the five years, t

Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

Tabitha Co.

The gain recorded on the sale of the patent is:

= $7,933

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

June 2, 2021, Purchase of Franchise for $586,000

Period of franchise = 5 years

September 1, 2023, Sale of Franchise for $340,000

Annual amortization expense = $117,200 ($586,000/5)

Amortization Schedule:

June 2, 2021 to December 31, 2021 = $58,600 ($117,200/2)

Jan. 1, 2022 to December 31, 2021 = $117,200

Jan. 1, 2023 to September 1, 2023 = $78,133 ($117,200 * 8/12)

Total amortization during the period = $253,933

Initial cost = $586,000

Accumulated amortization = $253,933

Reduced book value = $332,067

Sales proceed = $340,000

Gain from sales = $7,933 ($340,000 - $332,067)

6 0

1 year ago