The elements of a literary essay and their corresponding example are the following:
<h2>Thesis statement: </h2>
In Romeo and Juliet, Shakespeare presents a strong female character in the form of Juliet's nurse.
<h2>Textual evidence: </h2>
"NURSE: Your lady mother is coming to your chamber: The day is broke; be wary, look about."
<h2>Topic:</h2>
The roles of female characters in "Romeo and Juliet."
We should arrive at the house by to o’clock. Have a great day!
Diciembre 30, 2018
Jane Smith
Name of the company
15th Street, Ste 15
New York, NY 10018
Dear Ms. Smith,
I have read your new proposal for the workers' free days policy. After analyzing it, I consider that the extension and freedom in the use of our free days is excellent. Many times we get sick and decide to stay at home resting but then we have to do many medical procedures to prove our illness on the days we did not attend, with the new policy, workers should not be worry about getting medical notes when they are sick, this is really an advantage because it will allow us to rest peacefully.
About taking two consecutive days off is a great idea, many times the workers want to take a couple of days off to make small trips or to do some personal matters but we are embarrassed to ask for two days of rest in a row, so we prefer to wait until the weekend or wait until it is vacation time.
Although the proposal is very beneficial for the workers I think it is necessary to create some regulation parameters. For example, no more than three workers from the same department should take their two consecutive days off the same day as this can be counterproductive and generate a workload on other workers.
Also, although workers have the freedom to take a personal or sick day it is necessary to inform the head of the department as soon as possible in case there is any work that must be completed that same day, in this way the work that worker should do that day do not delay the work of others.
In conclusion, I believe that the new time off policy for workers is excellent and can improve the work performance of workers if it isregulated correctly. I hope that my answer will be useful to help you establish this new policy.
Best regards,
YOUR NAME
Essay claim: Requiring <em><u>voters</u></em> to <u><em>present picture</em></u> identification <u><em>reduces</em></u> voter participation.
<em><u>Many</u></em> people <u><em>lack</em></u> photo identification. Requiring <em><u>picture identification to vote would keep those without</u></em> it from voting. Elderly <em><u>people who no longer drive and people </u></em>who <em><u>live </u></em>in<em><u> low-income</u></em> areas often <em><u>lack</u></em> identification. They would be <em><u>unable</u></em> to vote. Mark Abernathy <u><em>argues</em></u>, "Requiring photo ID to vote <em><u>effectively</u></em> eliminates a <em><u>large group</u></em> of American voters. <em><u>However</u></em>, they are denied a basic <em><u>privilege given to all Americans over the age of 18</u></em>. A <em><u>part</u></em> of the population, not the entire population, <em><u>decides</u></em> elections" <em><u>" (page 820 of the article "Photo Identification Disenfranchisement").</u></em> Some <u><em>believe</em></u> this <em><u>isn't </u></em>true. Ria Olberson <em><u>of</u></em> Alabaster University <em><u>says</u></em>, "Few Americans <em><u>lack</u></em> a license. Even <em><u>an</u></em> expired or revoked license <em><u>counts as photo identification.</u></em> The<em><u> idea</u></em> that requiring <em><u>identification disenfranchises some Americans is </u></em>simply <em><u>false</u></em> " (page 101). Just just wrong! <em><u>Many people don't have licenses because they</u></em> don't need or <em><u>desire</u></em> them. Consider <em><u>city dwellers</u></em>. They <em><u>don't need</u></em> licenses: public transportation. <em><u>Many</u></em> of <em><u>these</u></em> people would <em><u>have</u></em> to <em><u>get</u></em> licenses in <em><u>order to participate in a process</u></em> <em><u>that they are entitled </u></em>to<em> </em>as <em><u>U.S.</u></em> citizens.
The correct answer is A. The squirrel, who ran in circles around the circumference of the tree, chattered angrily at the curious cat.
Explanation:
This sentence is a complex one, which means it is composed by an independent clause, which is a sentence that express a complete idea and a dependent clause, which is a type of sentence that provides extra information linked to a independent clause and depends on it to be complete, as dependent clauses are just extra information and can be omitted they are always marked by commas (,) or similar punctuation marks. In this case, the main sentence is "The squirrel chattered angrily at the curious cat" as it expresses the main idea, on the other hand "who ran in circles around the circumference of the three" is just extra information (dependent clause) and thus should be between commas. Thus, A is the correct revision as this sentence contains a dependent clause that according to grammar should be between commas.