Answer:
Explanation:
import java.util.Scanner;
public class KboatTriangleAngle
{
public static void main(String args[]) {
Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
System.out.print("Enter first angle: ");
int a1 = in.nextInt();
System.out.print("Enter second angle: ");
int a2 = in.nextInt();
System.out.print("Enter third angle: ");
int a3 = in.nextInt();
int angleSum = a1 + a2 + a3;
if (angleSum == 180 && a1 > 0 && a2 > 0 && a3 > 0) {
if (a1 < 90 && a2 < 90 && a3 < 90) {
System.out.println("Acute-angled Triangle");
}
else if (a1 == 90 || a2 == 90 || a3 == 90) {
System.out.println("Right-angled Triangle");
}
else {
System.out.println("Obtuse-angled Triangle");
}
}
else {
System.out.println("Triangle not possible");
}
}
}
OUTPUT:
Yes in my opinion. People will say no but there is no right answer
Answer:
a. The network will not satisfy the customers because the required addresses is 128 but what can be offered is 126.
b. 195.200.0.0/22
Explanation:
195.200.0.0/16
The number of bits to give 512 is 9
2^9=512
2^8=256 which is not up to our expected 320 customers that requires a network ip
Note we have to use a bit number that is equal or higher than our required number of networks.
The number of host per each subnet of the network (195.200.0.0/25) is (2^7)-2= 128-2=126
The network will not satisfy the customers because the required addresses is 128 but what can be offered is 126.
b. 64 customers requires 6 bits to be taken from the host bit to the network bit
i.e 2^6 = 64
195.200.0.0/22
The number of host per each subnet of the network (195.200.0.0/22) is (2^10)-2=1024 - 2 = 1022 hosts per subnet
This network meet the requirement " 64 customers want 128 addresses/customer "
<span> the answer would be: Does she have or can she develop the strengths needed for this type of work?</span><span />
Answer:
In RAID 2 Hamming Code ECC Each piece of the information word is kept in touch with an information plate drive . Every datum word has its Hamming Code ECC word recorded on ECC circles. On Read, the ECC code confirms the right information or revises the single plate blunders.
Strike Level 2 is one of the two innately equal mapping and assurance strategies characterized in the Berkeley paper. It has not been broadly sent in the business to a great extent since it requires an extraordinary plate highlights. Since plate creation volumes decides the cost, it is increasingly practical to utilize standard circles for the RAID frameworks.
Points of interest: "On the fly" it gives information blunder amendment. Amazingly high information move rates is possible.Higher the information move rate required,better the proportion of information circles to ECC plates. Moderately basic controller configuration contrasted with the other RAID levels 3,4 and 5.
Impediments: Very high proportion of the ECC plates to information circles with littler word sizes - wasteful. Passage level expense are extremely high - and requires exceptionally high exchange rate prerequisite to legitimize. Exchange rate is equivalent to that of the single plate, best case scenario (with shaft synchronization). No business executions can't/not industrially suitable.