answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
2 years ago
13

Rachel lives and works on her father’s dairy farm as a large animal veterinarian. The farm does not employ any outside workers.

One of the cows is having a difficult time delivering her calf. As Rachel approaches to help, the cow kicks wildly, breaking Rachel’s arm. Is Rachel covered under the OSH Act?
Business
1 answer:
tatiyna2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D. No, because Rachel's family farm does not employ outside workers.

Explanation:

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 in its most rudimentary form is a law in the United States meant to govern the occupational health and safety of federal government employees and the private sector as well.

Option D is correct because the law does not cover immediate family members on farms that do not employ outside employees.

You might be interested in
It is common for supermarkets to carry both generic (store-label) and brand-name (producer-label) varieties of sugar and other p
dsp73

Answer:

a. Do these preferences exhibit a diminishing marginal rate of substitution?

  • no, because the consumer is actually purchasing a higher amount of goods, the only difference is that they are paying a lower price.

Assume that this consumer has $24 of income to spend on sugar, and the price of store-brand sugar is $1 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar is $3 per pound.

  • The consumer will purchase 24 pounds of price of store sugar simply because the price is much lower, not because he/she wants to consume less. Actually a lower price might result in an increase of consumption.

b. How much of each type of sugar will be purchased?

  • If the consumer is willing to spend the whole $24 on sugar, he/she will purchase 24 pounds of store brand sugar. The alternative is to buy 8 pounds of producer brand sugar, and that is not a good deal.

c. How would your answer change if the price of store-brand sugar was $2 per pound and the price of producer-brand sugar was $3 per pound?

  • The consumer would purchase 12 pounds of store brand sugar instead of 24, but he/she will still not purchase producer brand sugar since the difference in price is still too high. Remember that consumers view both types of sugar as perfect substitutes, so they will purchase the brand with the lower price.
8 0
2 years ago
O'Brian's Department Stores allocates the costs of the Personnel and Payroll departments to three retail sales departments, Hous
Paul [167]

Answer:

<h2>O'Brian's Department Stores</h2>

a. Determination of the percentage of total Personnel Department services provided to the Payroll Department:

= No. of payroll department employees/Total number of employees x 100

= 3/35 x 100 = 8.57%

b. Determination of the percentage of total Payroll Department services provided to the Personnel Department:

= No. of personnel department employees/Total number of employees x 100

= 5/35 x 100 = 14.29%

c. Schedule showing Personnel Department and Payroll Department Cost Allocations to the Operating Departments, using the step method:

                  Personnel  Payroll    House   Clothing   Furniture       Total

                                                      Wares

Number of

 employees      5               3             9             15              3               35

Direct department

 cost              $6,500   $3,300   $11,900  $20,000   $16,350    $58,050

Gross payroll $6,400   $3,400   $11,400    $17,800    $8,000   $47,000

Personnel    -12,900      1,290      3,870        6,450       1,290       12,900

Payroll            0            -7,990      2,449        3,823         1,718        7,990

Total allocated 0             0       $29,619    $48,073  $27,358  $105,050

Explanation:

a) Data:

1. Personnel and Payroll departments' cost to Housewares, Clothing, and Furniture

2. Personnel and Payroll provide services to each other.

3. Basis of Service Departments' Cost Allocation:

Personnel Department:  Number of employees

Payroll Department: Gross Payroll

4. Cost and Allocation Information for June:

                    Personnel  Payroll    House   Clothing   Furniture    Total

                                                      Wares

Direct department

 cost              $6,500    $3,300    $11,900  $20,000   $16,350     $58,050

Number of

 employees      5               3             9             15              3               35

Gross payroll $6,400    $3,400   $11,400    $17,800    $8,000    $47,000

Personnel    -12,900       1,290      3,870        6,450       1,290       12,900

Payroll            0             -7,990      2,449        3,823         1,718        7,990

Total allocated 0             0        $29,619    $48,073  $27,358  $105,050        

b) Cost Allocation Calculations:

Personal cost = Personal Cost divided by the number of employees in the other departments

= $12,900/30 = $430 per employee

Payroll cost = Payroll cost divided by the total gross payroll in the other departments, excluding personnel and payroll departments

= $7,990/37,200 = $0.21478

c) Allocation of service departments' costs is a method of apportioning costs incurred by service departments to the production departments so that the costs could be captured in the production costs.  There are three methods for allocating service departments' costs to the production departments.  The first and the simplest is the direct method, whereby the costs of service departments are allocated directly to each production department based on the consumption of the service department's services.

The second method is the step method.  With this method, the costs of one service department with the highest cost are allocated to all other departments, including production and other service departments following a stepping methodology.  The costs of the next service department are allocated to the remaining departments.  This step is continued until all the service departments' costs have been allocated.  Note that a service department whose costs have been completely allocated would not be allocated any other cost.

The third method is the reciprocal method.  This establishes the relationship among the service departments and uses the established relationship in a linear equation to allocate the costs of service departments.  While it is more accurate, it is also the most complicated.  Three steps are followed as follows: determine allocation bases, set up the formula, which shows the relationships, and finally add up the allocated costs to the production departments.  Details cannot be discussed here.

3 0
2 years ago
List and describe the three communities of interest that engage in an organization’s efforts to solve InfoSec problems. Give two
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

<u>List Of Communities Interest that engage in an organization's effort.</u>

1) Information Security Community

2) Information Technology Community

3) General Business Community

Explanation:

1)<u> Information Security Community</u><u>:</u> This community protects the organization information assets from many threats they face. Example: This community comprises of the IT Professionals, Chief information security officer, and managers who bear the responsibility to secure the information.

2)<u> Information Technology Community</u><u>:</u> This community supports the business objectives of the organization by supplying and supporting IT that is appropriate to the organization needs. Examples: IT Professionals, Chief information officer, and managers who acts as providers of information technologies.

3)<u> General Business Community</u><u>:</u> This community articulates and communicates organizational policy and objectives and allocates resources to the other group. This community includes: Non-IT Professionals, Users and Managers.

5 0
2 years ago
A customer has requested that Lewelling Corporation fill a special order for 1,900 units of product S47 for $41 a unit. While th
Mariana [72]

Answer:

Profit from sale of special order = $77,900 - $33,610 = $44,290

Explanation:

Being a special order and an added opportunity to its regular sales of S47, we will be looking at the Marginal Costs of accepting to produce the order:

Direct Material = $4.30

Direct Labour = $4.00

Variable Overhead = $3.60

Fixed Manufacturing Overhead = $6.30

Total Costs = $18.20

But, Fixed Costs is already covered/absorbed by our existing business; as such we need not include it in the costing of the special order

And there is an Additional investment in moulds = $11,000

Total cost of special order = ($18.20 - $6.30) x 1,900 units + $11,000

= $33,610

Sales of special order = 1,900 units x $41 =$77,900

Profit from sale of special order = $77,900 - $33,610 = $44,290

6 0
2 years ago
Leslie is charged with determining which small projects should be funded. Along with this assignment, she has been granted the u
Andru [333]

Answer:

The answer is: Leslie should fund projects A and C

Explanation:

In order to determine if a project should be accepted, the first thing Leslie has to do is determine the projects´ Net Present Value (NPV). If the NPV is 0 or more, then the projects could be funded.  

The formula to calculate NPV is:

             NPV = ∑{p/( 1+r)t} - C

  • p = net cash flows from the period
  • r = discount rate (8.5% in this case)
  • t = number of periods
  • c = capital invested

<u>Project A:</u>

p = $4000;$4000;$4000

r = 8.5%

t = 3

c = $7,500

The NPV for Project A is $2,716.09

<u>Project B:</u>

p = $3000;$4000;$3000

r = 8.5%

t = 3

c = $8,000

The NPV for Project B is $511.52

<u>Project C:</u>

p = $0;$2,500

r = 8.5%

t = 2

c = $2,000

The NPV for Project C is $123.64

Once you calculate the NPVs from projects A,B and C you must determine how to distribute the $15,000 available. All three projects have positive NPVs, so they are profitable. But you can´t fund projects A and B since their combined costs ($7,500 + $8,000 = $15,500) exceeds $15,000. Leslie should invest in project A since its NPV is higher ($2,716.09 ˃ $511.52). She should also fund project C since its NPV is positive ($123.64) and the capital needed is smaller (only $2,000).

                     

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Describe an example of a task that it might make sense for a company to outsource. (1-2 sentences. 2.0 points) 2. Describe th
    11·2 answers
  • Karen Most has a federal tax levy of $2,100.50 against her. If Most is single with two personal exemptions and had a take-home p
    8·1 answer
  • A foreign company (whose sales will not affect cornish's market) offers to buy 3,000 units at $17.00 per unit. in addition to va
    13·1 answer
  • Suppose a family has saved enough for a 10 day vacation (the only one they will be able to take for 10 years) and has a utility
    8·1 answer
  • A fleet repair facility has the capacity to repair 800 trucks per month. However, due to scheduled maintenance of their equipmen
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of the relationship between the average product of labor and the marginal product of laborLOADING
    14·1 answer
  • The manager of a company that makes fertilizer releases a report to the media. The report shows that tomato plants that are fed
    15·1 answer
  • Solar Hydro manufactures a revolutionary aeration system that combines coarse and fine bubble aeration components. This year (ye
    7·1 answer
  • The local supermarket buys lettuce each day to ensure really fresh produce. Each morning any lettuce that is left from the previ
    8·1 answer
  • Each service starts on a different date because the services depend on each other. Enter the starting dates for the remaining se
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!