Hello!
In linguistics, we recognise 4 types of arguments, and two of them are experience, and examples; therefore, in this case, correct answer is: The Narrators growth can contrast naive views with the harsh realities of war.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Netherlands was a coronavirous in many cityzin or in southern Africa and more people were died
Williams show that the wheelbarrow is an essential part of life on a farm through the phrase: "so much depends upon" it leads the readers to infere the importance of the wheelbarrow.
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
<h3><em>B) Bucks forebears.</em></h3><h2><em>hope it helps </em></h2><h2><em>(◕‿◕✿) </em></h2>
