Answer: 88.89 or 89
Explanation: Futures contract refers to a legal binding which obligates a buyer and seller to transact about a commodity, good, security or services at a predetermined price but goods are delivered or paid for in the future.
Given the following ;
Portfolio value(p) = $20million
Portfolio Beta (b) = 1.2
Index price (i) = 1080
Multiplier = 250
Future value(A) = index price × multiplier
Future value(A) = 1080 × 250 = 270000
Number of contracts (N) = (portfolio value × portfolio Beta) ÷ future value
N = ($20,000,000×1.2)÷270000
N = 24000000 ÷×270000
N = 88.8888=88.89
N = 89 (NEAREST whole number)
Answer:
Increase by $31,200
Explanation:
Retain Truck Replace Truck Net Increase
Sale price of old Truck $0 $32,200 $32,200
Cost of New Truck $0 -$132,000 -$132,000
Variable manuf. cost -$131,000 $0 $131,000
Net Income -$131,000 -$99,800 $31,200
The total increase in income by replacing the old Truck is $31,200.
The research and testing costs associated with the new ovens is said to arise from a product-sustaining activity.
Explanation:
Product-sustaining activities are carried out where appropriate to facilitate the production of each product type. Types of design-sustaining practices include product requirements, technical improvements and special testing procedures.
Such costs may be assigned to each commodity but are not proportional to the number of manufactured units or quantities. Organisation-sustaining operations support the overall production cycle of an organisation.
The ventilation and maintenance of the building, the protection of the facility and the administration are examples of safe facilities.
Products are allocated the costs for the operations at a unit level, batch level and component level depending on the consumption of each commodity. Goods are distributed randomly or viewed as time expense for purpose of facility-sustaining operations.
Answer:
Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :
a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.
b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.
c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.
Don’t trust my word I just need to answer questions i’m so sorry
