answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleonysh [2.5K]
2 years ago
9

Did the Dodgers make a mistake by choosing Jackie Robinson over Satchel Paige to be their first black baseball player? Use evide

nce from the text to support your argument
English
2 answers:
pogonyaev2 years ago
8 0

This question is related to the text "Before Jackie: How Strikeout King Satchel Paige Struck Down Jim Crow"

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

In Satchel Paige's view the Dodgers made a mistake in choosing Jackie Robinson over him to be their first black baseball player. That's because Paige proved to be a formidable player much longer than Robinson, in addition to being visibly better on the pitch. In addition, it was Paige who highlighted the black players, in addition to using all the influence he had to help and highlight the black players, something that Robinson did not do.

nirvana33 [79]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, he did not make a mistake because he was a better baseball player than Jackie Robinson, and had proven himself against the best white players

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What makes the ending of "The Necklace" Ironic? Atleast a one paragraph response!
tatuchka [14]
The necklace is ironic in the fact that when the necklace is borrowed it is believed to be a real diamond necklace. When she loses the "diamond necklace" she works very long to repay the person she borrowed from because she thinks the necklace she lost was worth much money. When she gives the money to the person she borrowed from and confesses that she lost it she was told that the necklace was a fake and that she worried and worked for many years over nothing. This is an example of situational irony. She thought the necklace was worth very much money when it was really only worth very little
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from E.O. Wilson’s “The Environmental Ethic.” Species are disappearing at an accelerating rate through human ac
irga5000 [103]

The author is trying to convey that in recent years, the extinction rate for many animal species has significantly increased. He began his point in the first sentence of the excerpt: “Species are disappearing at an accelerating rate through human action, primarily habitat destruction but also pollution and the introduction of exotic species into residual natural environments.” Then, he further emphasizes his point in the sentence: “As the last forests are felled in forest strongholds like the Philippines and Ecuador, the decline of species will accelerate even more.” Which is immediately followed by another sentence that supports his argument: “In the world as a whole, extinction rates are already hundreds or thousands of times higher than before the coming of man.

6 0
2 years ago
Read the excerpt from "Children of the Drug Wars." The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees recently interviewed 404 ch
siniylev [52]

The correct answer is B) The first excerpt uses facts and statistics and the second excerpt is told as a story.

We can clearly appreciate how despite both excerpts have the same theme they relay the information in different ways. The first excerpt is clearly an article about Kids from Honduras who were leaving their country due to violence and the author uses statistics to prove his/her point whereas the second one is an excerpt from 'Entrique's Journey' that's related to the refugee situation..

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best compares and contrasts these two arguments? Chamberlain and Nehru both appeal to the fears of their audienc
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

just took the test

4 0
2 years ago
Which statement best describes Grendel’s perspective?
Margarita [4]

Answer:

He describes the length of the men’s decision-making process.

Explanation:

First, Grendel explores the world as a child. He notices the world is full of danger and possibility. Then, he undergoes other situations; he is attacked by a bull , so he realises the world is chaotic. He has become an adut  as a result of this situation . This chaos makes him  ask how a person can survive in such a hostile world. This question leads him to observe how the humans live and he gets attracted by the organization of the human community. He gets interested in this organised system.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the passage.
    9·2 answers
  • What sort of tone does Bly take to his subject matter in “Counting Small-boned Bodies”? Do you think his tone matches his true f
    11·2 answers
  • Which excerpt from “Ambush” best reflects the story’s central conflict?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was the open-border policy important for enabling China to prosper during the rule of the Song dynasty? Select all that appl
    11·2 answers
  • Based on this passage, which values seem to be most important to the Maori?
    10·2 answers
  • Which statement best explains the difference in character depictions for the two interpretations of the play?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement is an example of finding common ground when addressing a counterclaim?
    10·2 answers
  • Amanda says that most Americans prefer to shop online rather than in stores. She is using a logical fallacy called
    14·1 answer
  • What does the speaker of the poem imply about being American?
    14·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from "A Modest Proposal."As to our City of Dublin, shambles may be appointed for this purpose, in the most conv
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!