The answer is "<span>Modeled the As-Is process, fixed the errors, and then created the To-Be process".
</span>
An “as is” business process characterizes the present condition of the business procedure in an association. Normally the examination objective in assembling the present state process is to clear up precisely how the business procedure functions today, kinks and all.
A “to be” business process characterizes the future condition of a business procedure in an association. Ordinarily the investigation objective in assembling the future state process is to illuminate how the business procedure will function, sooner or later, once changes are made.
Answer:
Seth's total profits is $1,535.359
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
MC = 0 and we will ignore fixed costs
Therefore TC = 0
Demand function in Santa barbara is
p = 74 - q
MR = 74 - 2q
Since Seth sets different uniform prices in two markets to maximizes his profit therefore
,
MR = MC
74 - 2q = 0
2q = 74
q=37
p = 74 - 37 = 37
Profit = pq - TC
= 37*37 - 0
= $1,369
Inverse demand finction Goleta is
p = 39 - 4q
MR = 39 - 8q
MR = MC
39 - 8q = 0
8q = 39
q = 4.875
p = 39 - 4.875 = 34.125
Profit = pq - TC
= 34.125*4.875 - 0
= $166.359
Therefore, Seth's total profits = $1,369 + $166.359
Seth's total profits= $1,535.359
Seth's total profits is $1,535.359
Answer: collectivism
Complete Question:
Cedric, a brand manager, transferred from the united States to japan He discovered that although people in the United States highly valued individualism, people in Japan expect individuals to conform to group expectations. Cedric concluded that Japan places more of an emphasis on:
Explanation: Collectivism values the group over individuals belonging to the group. In cultures where collectivism is the norm, individuals tend to want to conform to the group expectations. Also, it is common for individuals in collectivist societies to define themselves as belonging to a group than as individuals so groups are a way of identifying themselves.
While individualism values individuals's right and uniqueness, collectivism does not but sees value in maintaining the cohesion in a group, which in turn promotes conformity.
