Answer:
Authorial reticence allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence can be defined as a term with lack of clear conclusion, description, opinions etc. about an event. More so, It allows the narrator to exaggerate and hence escape the judgement. Many readers abhor authorial reticence due to absence of clear judgement. Their authors are permitted to include fantasies and magics which will make readers concluding things based on their own perspectives. Furthermore, It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and no clear conclusion is reached.
I believe that answer D. would be the correct one
Answer:
In the poem, the speaker seems to be discussing a pleasant date, as if oblivious to the fact that this is a journey to death. The tone of the poem seems light and perhaps even dismissive of all the scenes passing by, as though these cornerstones of life were not terribly significant. However, the underlying mood of the poem is somewhat sad because the speaker is describing a world she’s leaving behind. This difference between the descriptions of the outing and of dying creates some dramatic irony. The speaker sees but doesn’t really see the world of the living because she’s already dead.
Explanation:
This is the exact from Edmentum so make sure to change it up a little.
<u>The correct answer is: It demonstrates that Nora is considering leaving her children.</u> Nora reveals to the nurse that she fears that her children will forget her if she leaves definitively. Nora believes that her secret will be revealed and she will be expelled from her home, her family and society. Nora did not have to worry about taking care of the children because she had the help of the nurse and more servants.
The answer is it's set against a historical backdrop. While the other statements can be true, historical fiction is defined as fiction set in a different historical time period.
