Answer:
Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).
The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.
The law can hold Leslie liable for multiple reasons. I believe all except "strict liability" are possible. By failing to supervise her children, they chose to do something they would most likely not do with her around--battering Mrs. Timmons' plants. This was an act of laziness, which lead to negligence.
Answer:
<h3>b. requires employers to furnish each employee with a place of employment that is free from hazards.</h3>
Explanation:
- The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) was implemented to provide safe and health friendly working conditions for employees who work in factories, industries, and other manufacturing sites.
- The OSHA puts forwards a number of conditions that every employers need to adopt in a working place to safeguard the employees. One of the mandatory condition of OSHA is that requires employers to furnish each employee with a place of employment that is free from hazards.
