<u>Read the sentence.
</u>
The shop next door, which is family owned, creates specially made, chocolate covered desserts.
Which part of the sentence should be hyphenated?
-
“next door”
- “family owned”
- “specially made”
- “chocolate covered”
<u>Answer:</u>
“chocolate covered”is a part of the sentence which should be hyphenated.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A hyphen is a punctuation mark that is utilized to join words or parts of words. In this sentence covered - chocolate is a hyphenated word that represents food. For the most part, hyphenate at least two words when they precede a thing they change and go about as a solitary thought.
This is known as a compound descriptive word. At the point when a compound descriptive word follows a thing, a hyphen is normally a bit much.
ANSWER:
The correct sentences are:
1) Friday is the deadline to submit applications; if you are interested in the job, submit your resume soon.
2) She said: "Check in the file cabinet because it might be there."
3) All six work groups’ status reports were due on April 23.
EXPLANATION:
1) semicolon are use to join two related sentence. Because the two sentence are related, semicolon can be used.
2) are used to show list of items or what someone said. The quotation marks was use to indicate what a person has said.
3) The apostrophe is used to indicate ownership. It is used in this sentence to show the ownership of the group which is plural.
Answer: A. Mrs. Price tells her to put it on.
Explanation:
All of the programs are helpful in alleviating poverty because people don't have to pay for them. Nutrition programs give you food form the country just like housing and free healthcare are made to stop you from wasting your own money on it. All of the programs help people spend money on things that they need and are not for basic survival.
A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
