Answer:
The contrast between life and death becomes prominent towards the end of the story. This story ending is not a very happy ending but a realistic one. “ 'She gave me a message: she told me to tell you. She told me to tell you that she never was engaged to that handsome Italian. I am sure I am very glad; Mr. Giovanelli hasn't been near us since she was taken ill. I thought he was so much of a gentleman; but I don't call that very polite!’ ” (James 448). This is very sad to hear if you are in Winterbourne’s position. He really loved her and she loved him but she was playing with his heart. Also, the fact that Mr. Giovanelli did not come around anymore shows his intentions were not the same as Winterbourne’s. Love and death is a sensitive subject that shows throughout the story and never fails to add a realness and an emotional standpoint to a story. These contrasts are what makes the story interesting and keep the readers on the edge of their seats. If these contrasts were solved or there were no conflicts would the story be as good? The story would possibly be completely different. If Daisy were not as spontaneous and flirtatious it would be safe to say her and Winterbourne could have had a life together. If American and European cultures were not as opposing would their even be any conflicts to begin with? These questions arise as contrasts are thought of as ideas are contrasted.
According to Emerson, a fully realized person is when we follow our own conscience. " that diving idea " what ... trust thyself every heart vibrates to that iron string ". Strong if you trust thyself.
Hope this helped
Answer:
I believe the answer is C.
Explanation:
The court cannot place its own opinion over the opinion of the jury.
The Nobel Prize for Literature aims to reward a writer, regardless of his nationality, who has developed a literary work of the highest quality and remarkable meaning that must be disseminated and awarded.
In one of the Nobel Prize for Literature, Bob Dylan, a musician and composer was awarded and had the honor of receiving this award, which generated a great debate within the literary society that presented controversial reasons for this permission. That's because Dylan was not a writer but a musician, causing many not to believe that he should receive an award for literary works.
However, we must not forget that music is nothing more than sung poetry and like all poetry, it must be written with literary devices, correct grammar, coherence, cohesion, rhyme, tone and all the other factors that make up a literary work. . A composer is a writer, and is one of the most notable writers, since the music must convey a sunjunctive message, but full of meaning.
Based on this, we can say that it is impossible to doubt the merit of Bob Dylan and any other composer to receive the Nobel Prize for Literature, since his work is nothing more than a literary work.
Answer:
This technique benefits me as a learner as it helps me to visualise my method and approach to solving a problem before I go about solving it. This is pertinent especially in problem based subjects like mathematics. In learning, this is also helpful in helping me to internalise the information gathered, for example, being able to mentally link the information together on a concept map in your head or on paper also helps in retaining information. This concept of visualisation and categorisation is similar to the thinking process of computational thinking which involves breaking down the problem and solving it abstractly.
I do not agree that this only works for visual learners. While visual learners tend to be more inclined to this method of processing in their minds or on paper, I feel that everyone uses this method to a certain extent although through a different methodology or thought process.
Explanation:
