The correct answer is option "A. How the antagonist opposes other characters in the story.
"
The antagonist is the restricting power in a story. It could be a human enemy, or it could be non-human, similar to a creature or something less substantial, similar to fear. The antagonist assumes a vital part in story improvement. Consider a most loved motion picture you jump at the chance to watch. In the event that there is antagonist in a story or motion picture, this is on the grounds that there is a type of enemy. The protagonist in the story is looking for determination; the antagonist opposes such determination, however all great stories require antagonists.
I would say that the thing that would likely happen is C) Unferth challenges Beowulf again, and the two fight to the death.
Beowulf would never say no to a fight, and he wouldn't die so easily.
He remembered the advice of the old-timer on Sulphur Creek, and smiled.
The fire was a success. He was safe.
Are the two sentences
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer:
Increasing the space mission efforts
Explanation:
United States President John F. Kennedy's Rice Stadium Moon speech (September 12, 1962) was exclusively to persuade the American people to support the the efforts of space mission, and to land a man on the moon.
During the visit John Glen (who had already orbited the earth on February 20, 1962) was was also with the President, hence, the speech was certainly not about launching John Glen in the Atlas.
