Explanation:
It’s a job I know I can do and that I share a lot of interest in but I’m not confident in my ruseme, even though I never worked, I feel like I’ll be thrown in the trash. I looked on the internet for help and came across this but it looks like you all have a lot of good education or at least worked before. Any advice, really all I have is my name and personal animal care on my resume.
I disagree because if you cut off ties from your culture and your past, you're only setting yourself up for failure. You are prone to make the same mistakes again. The past helps shape your future.
Answer:
Outreach
Explanation:
The three options provided are types of people i.e "children", "elderly", and "homeless". So, the fourth element too should be a type of people. Hence, "Finances", and "Conservation" are eliminated.
Out of "Students" and "Outreach", "outreach" would be better option;
Firstly because, children (age), elderly (age) homeless (location), and then fourth too should be about location i.e. "Outreach"
Secondly, because "students" is a sort of occupation, children may also be students. So, "Students" does not fit well with the three provided options.
In this excerpt, the rhetorical technique that the passage best exemplify is:
A. Parallelism
Parallelism is when there is grammar equilibrium in two or more sentences, we can see such a case in these two sentences: They picked handfuls of daisies. They picked bunches of daffodils. On the one hand, the subject is the same They, and on the other the Tense is also the same.
We find no evidence of exaggeration of any type, nor there is satire or irony.