Answer:
Both of the texts talks about the female protagonist's inability to control what her fate brings on her. Mrs. Mallard's society where women were presumed or taken to be inferior to the men led to her subordinate nature of her existence. Mrs. Sommers, on the other hand, likewise suffers from a reality where the shopping experience led to her spending all for herself instead of the pre-planned things to be bought and needed.
Explanation:
Naturalism is the idea that a person's fate or destiny is controlled by his/ her surroundings, be it the society or even the domestic sphere. This naturalism can be demonstrated by a person's characterization which shows him/her being constrained by the external elements in the society, especially women in a patriarchal society.
Kate Chopin's two short stories "The Story of An Hour" and "A Pair of Silk Stockings" both revolve around the theme of women being suppressed in their societies. Mrs. Mallard was happy in her heart to hear of her husband's death for that means she is finally free from his "<em>powerful will bending hers</em>". Likewise, Mrs. Sommers life revolves around her family. So, when she go the money, she had planned don buying things for everyone. But the external forces in the market, when she went to shop, led her to spend not in the ways she had planned. She instead indulge on her needs and wants, leading her to spend contrary to the original plan. Chopin wrote "<em>Her stockings and boots and well fitting gloves had worked marvels in her bearing—had given her a feeling of assurance, a sense of belonging to the well-dressed multitude.</em>"
Based on the description above, the following analyses can be made:
1. Clarissa's concern is addressing t<span>he study's construct validity
2. Quinn's </span>concern is addressing the study's external validity
3. Manish's concern is addressing the study’s statistical validity
In addition, you may be asked, for what it means if Anton is concerned that the researcher made a Type I error. The answer to that would be that the researcher concluded there was a relationship between bullying and self-esteem<span>, whereas there is really no relationship.</span>
Since, the options are not given the question is incomplete the complete question is as follows:
Consider the machine from the previous question. If you were responsible for tuning this machine, what evaluation metric would you want to maximize to ensure all criminals (people about to commit a crime) are imprisoned (where crime is the positive label)?
A. Sensitivity
B. Specificity
C. Accuracy
D. Area under curve
Answer: A. Sensitivity
Explanation:
The person is imprisoned the person can be considered criminal. To ensure the fact that all criminal people are about to commit the crime are imprisoned we have to maximize the sensitivity, thus the crime here can be considered as a positive label.
Hence, based on the above description, option A. Sensitivity is correct.
The correct answer is D.
The cost has risen 1,000$ (comparting the 1500$ he had paid, with the 2500$ his friend has offered for the vacation, 1000$ is the amount he would miss if rejecting the offer plus the value of the activity he would do instead of the skiing vacation).
This cost rise represents the concept of opportunity cost. It is referred, when making a decision, to the value that is missed when rejecting the alternative option.
