The values of family and perseverance of the Greek that is reflect or shown in return of Odysseus is that they really love their home and family and also even if Odysseus is not a faithful man but Penelope is still the women inside her heart. I hope you are satisfied with my answer
Ani says that Dan Deluca wrote an article that contradicts his stance of the Nobel being well deserved at times, the two sentences of said article that show this kind of contradiction are:
Many of Dylan’s most fervently loved songs—some of which actually are love songs—date from the 1960s, and his being honored at age 75 can be seen as an ultimate affirmation for the baby boomer generation.
and
And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing.
this is because they say that the Nobel might be a product of simple nostalgia and they undermine Dylan as an artist, plus these seem to not be quotes from detractors but something Dan DeLuca is saying himself
1. avis, clarus, and penna.
2. celer and magnus
3. canto, brevis, and avis
4. penna, avis, and fervo
5. mare and aqua
6. curso, avis, and rotundus.
These are the answers I think fit best. Hope they help.
Hi there, can you tell me what the lines of 55-63 are? That would help answer your question.
Thanks,
-Wolfs c:
*hope you have a wonderful day/evening.*
In this excerpt, the rhetorical technique that the passage best exemplify is:
A. Parallelism
Parallelism is when there is grammar equilibrium in two or more sentences, we can see such a case in these two sentences: They picked handfuls of daisies. They picked bunches of daffodils. On the one hand, the subject is the same They, and on the other the Tense is also the same.
We find no evidence of exaggeration of any type, nor there is satire or irony.
