I think the most likely reason Churchill regularly brougth up negative details about the war is:
A. He wants Britain to have realistic expectations about the future.
As a great strategist, Churchill focused on the evidence given by other battles, like the German victory in France, to learn from his enemy. By lying to his people, british army would not be prepared for the battles coming and wold be defeated. Some generals in World War II believed that war would be fougth like World War I, they were not based on any evidence, and were eventually surprised by the new tactics the German developed (like the Blitzkrieg).
Churchill was able to make alliances with the United States and the URSS, so letter B. seems incorrect.
History made clear that Churchill was a great leader that never gave up so letter C. seems incorrect too.
By giving negative details abaout war Germany wouldn't think Britain is weak so letter D is incorrect.
flongboo, flongboo, flangwayers, hippers, hangjasts
The sentences that express the same ideas are:
"Blake organized the successful fundraiser, and he raised money for a local food bank."
"A successful event, Blake's fundraiser raised money for a local food bank."
These two sentences combine the sentences "Blake organized the successful fundraiser" and "Blake raised money for a local bank food.".
The meaning of the sentences combined is the same.
The motivation was to raise money for the local bank food, and to get that, Blake organized a fundraiser. The event was successful and Blake raised the money for the local food bank.
Answer:
It is a mercy he didn't shake his arm off.
Explanation:
Though, admittedly, this is one of those rare times that I am not 100% confident with my response.
