<u>Adjusting entry for Rent Receivable:</u>
It is given that Sanborn Company rents space to a tenant for $3,100 per month. The tenant currently owes rent for November and December, it means the Rent Receivable as on Dec. 31 is (3100*2) = $6,200
So the adjusting entry as on Dec. 31 shall be as follows:
Rent Receivable Debit $6,200
Rent Revenue Credit $6,200
(Being adjustment made for rent receivable)
Answer:
1.2
Explanation:
current ratio = current assets / current liabilities
- current assets = cash ($5,000) + accounts receivable ($15,000) + inventory ($40,000) + prepaid insurance ($3,000) = $63,000
- current liabilities = accounts payable ($15,000) + notes payable in 5 months ($12,500) + salaries payable ($25,000) = $52,500
current ratio = $63,000 / $52,500 = 1.2
I think I must first get the marginal cost of the product before i bought if it is worth it to its value, Then i would compute for the marginal benefit to know what would i gain in this product. Lastly I would compare both the marginal cost and marginal percentage if the cost is lower than the benefit then the product is worth it to buy.
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available