The correct answer is C; It is improper for Joe to assume these responsibilities as he may not sign documents using Dan's name.
Further Explanation:
Joe can't sign the attorneys name on any legal questions or documents on the titles. This is unethical as this is forgery since he isn't signing his own name. If Joe does sign off with the attorneys signature and the search was not correct then the attorney, Sally, and Joe will all be in legal trouble.
The attorney will have to review Sally's work and sign off on it. Since Joe is an attorney, he could actually sign his own name to these papers if it is within his job description and there would be no issues.
Learn more about paralegals at brainly.com/question/1878109
#LearnwithBrainly
A congress members bill is an example of which type of legislation: B) a concurrent resolution. A concurrent resolute is a resolution adopted by both the houses of bicameral legislature that is non-binding and does not require the approval of the president. It is only members of congress that can introduce legislation while anyone can draft a bill. Hope this helps :)
The elements of a crime are criminal act, criminal intent, concurrence, causation, harm, and attendant circumstances. Only crimes that specify a bad result have the elements of causation and harm.
<u>Her intent</u>- To charge for expenses she will incur on a vacation.
<u>Concurrence</u>- She used the card to fill her car with gas.
She committed Larceny with intent.
The crime included the elements of crimincal intent, concurrence and causation.
Here's an article to help you out more:
https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/white-collar-crime/misappropriation-of-funds.htm
Answer:
The correct option is A: Aristotle argues that justice is giving people what they deserve, while Rawls believes that moral desert is irrelevant when it comes to a just distribution of goods.
Explanation:
Rawls was dismissive towards the idea of moral desert whereas Aristotle believed that the distribution of goods should be done on the basis of merit. The two philosophers had their own line of logic and having differing point of views does not mean that they cancel out one another in any way.
Hope that answers the question, have a great day!
Explanation:
if not possible, customer should not pass through food prep area to get to the restroom should be convenient, sanitary ... -be placed on smooth, durable, nonabsorbent surface (asphalt and concrete) -have tight fitting