Explanation:
Case description
A construction company is owned by Mr. Jonathan Simpson A subcontractor was working with him and when he has completed the work he was paid $10,750 but the actual payment was $ 12.750. But after short time the contractor contacted the owner of the company to pay him the replacement check, When the owner checked his accounting system he found something wrong is happening in the company’s account system. The owner knows that only one person other that can access the account. So he wants to collect the evidences against the employee. The first aim should be to hire the forensic
investigator from the investigating company to collect the evidences against him. Computer forensics Computer forensics involves the digital evidence in support of crime, or administrative cases to be used as evidence. The evidence obtained should be legal. authentic, and admissible. It is different from data recovery, work forensics and disaster recovery in many aspects. In computer forensic we search for an unknown data which was hidden by the suspect or user which can be used as a valid proof against the suspect.
The law can hold Leslie liable for multiple reasons. I believe all except "strict liability" are possible. By failing to supervise her children, they chose to do something they would most likely not do with her around--battering Mrs. Timmons' plants. This was an act of laziness, which lead to negligence.
Answer:
this is correct, is this cyber security or ccna ?
Explanation:
I can provide you with a good content for ccna
I’m in kindergarten I don’t know
When improvements or buildings are added to real estate, the real estate tax assessment is usually increased to reflect the increased value of the property. Frank Partipilo and Elmer Hallman owned neighboring tracts of land. Hallman made improvements to his land, constructing a new building and driveway on the tract. The tax assessor made a mistake about the location of the boundary line between
Partipilo's and Hallman's land and thought the improvements were made on Partipilo' Instead of increasing the taxes on Hallman's assessor wrongly increased the taxes on Partipilo's
land. Partipilo paid the increased taxes for three years. When he learned why his taxes had been increased, he sued Hallman for the amount of the increase that Partipilo had been paying. Hallman raised the defense that he had not done anything wrong and that the mistake has been the fault of the tax assessor. Decide.
