I think it would be simple since it only has one subject (it) and one predicate (is).
Answer: Colin's evidence is not relevant to his claim<u> because it is about flying drones being a sport, not about privacy issues.</u>
Explanation: Colin's evidence is not related to his main claim, that is to say the assertion that drones do not invade people's privacy<u>. Instead of focusing on providing evidence that supports the idea that drones do not affect people's privacy negatively, Colin offers evidence related to the thought that flying drones is a sport </u>by stating that coordination and technical skills are necessary to fly drones. Therefore, it can be said that his argument lacks strength because it has not been properly supported.
The correct answer is:
C) Thomas Paine's purpose is to persuade his audience to persist in their course of action
Patrick Henry's purpose is to exhort his audience to follow a new course of action.
hope I could help!
Answer:the author sees his time at Lincoln school and thinks other students there did too
Part b: step by step she loosened me and my classmates from the safe...
Explanation:I took the quiz and got it correct
Answer:
Through this one can infer about the father in the Watson family that he's been killed in previous year's lottery as Jack Watson, Mr. Watson's son is appointed as the head of the household.
Explanation:
'The Lottery' is a short story written by Shirley Jackson. The short story is about ritual of drawing lottery and the one whom lottery falls is killed by townspeople.
In the story, when Mrs. Watson was asked about who will draw for her family, she asserts that she will draw for her family. But the lottery is to be drawn by the male of the family only. So, Jack Watson will draw for his family. Through this incident, one can infer that Mr. Watson has been killed in the previous year's lottery. It is because, now, Jack Watson is head of the Watson family.
