Our state’s Bill of Rights extends its protections to all Texans. Rather than just simply saying “all Texans,” however, the Bill
of Rights changed in 1972 to name specific groups. Regardless of your membership in any of these groups, as a Texan you are guaranteed your rights. Why would lawmakers be so specific in describing who receives rights in the state? In a short paragraph, explain your ideas and predict what might happen if the Texas Bill of Rights were not this specific.
The reason why the Texas Bill of Rights describes who receives rights in the state naming specific groups is because of inclusion, diversity, and equality recognition of individuals among law.
Explanation:
The reason behind this answer is that after inclusion, diversity, and equality were included on a social scale. We recognize each group, instead of including them al in "all Texans". Because the meaning of providing enough importance to all the different types of individuals is equality. Since in "all Texans" we assume that a male adjective is enough to identify children, women, and the rest o the groups in society. It is a factor of inclusion.
<span>One factor determining the number of
representatives for a given congressional district is the distribution
of D. population within the state.</span>
Hi there! Kipling feels that colonialism is strong and it supports its terms on cultures and beliefs. He also feels that it is important for both the imperialistic country and the country that is conquered.
