Answer: A) Give and explain counter-arguments against the arguments for each side.Note: the "counter-arguments" you are asked to give should oppose or answer the arguments on the other side as directly and convincingly as possible. They should not be simply unrelated arguments on the opposite side of the issue.
Explanation: When is talking about security is important to have different views, firstable you need to establish which are going to be your claims, premises or arguments, once you got it is important to search for information which can support your ideas, and once you have found it, counter-arguments are necessary to understand which are your weakest point, you need to know your counter-arguments and how people are likely to attack you, once you know the weak part of your speech you can defend it.
<span>Answer:
At what unit sales level would WCC have the same EPS, assuming it undertakes the investment and finances it with debt or with stock? {Hint: V = variable cost per unit = $8,160,000/440,000, and EPS = [(PQ - VQ - F - I)(1 - T)]/N. Set EPSStock = EPSDebt and solve for Q.} Round your answer to the nearest whole.
units
At what unit sales level would EPS = 0 under the three production/financing setups - that is, under the old plan, the new plan with debt financing, and the new plan with stock financing? (Hint: Note that VOld = $10,200,000/440,000, and use the hints for Part b, setting the EPS equation equal to zero.) Round your answers to the nearest whole.
Old plan units
New plan with debt financing units
New plan with stock financing units
On the basis of the analysis in parts a through c, and given that operating leverage is lower under the new setup, which plan is the riskiest, which has the highest expected EPS, and which would you recommend? Assume here that there is a fairly high probability of sales falling as low as 250,000 units, and determine EPSDebt and EPSStock at that sales level to help assess the riskiness of the two financing plans. Round your answers to two decimal places.
EPSDebt = $
EPSStock = $</span>
Answer:
On IRR basis projects 1, 2, 3, and 5 will be selected.
On NPV basis projects 1, 3, 5, and 6 will be selected.
Explanation:
The firm will accept or choose all the project that has a higher or equal internal rate of interest than cost of capital. However, in the given case project 4 has a lower internal rate of interest (12 percent) than the cost of capital. Thus, projects 1, 2, 3, and 5 will be chosen by the firm. While the firm has budget constraints so it will have no money for projects 4 and 6.
The firm will select all the projects with positive NPV when there is no budget constraint. But in case of budget constraint, the firm will select the project that has high NPV. Thus, Project 1, 6, 3, and 5 will be selected and there will be no money left for projects 2 and 4.
Answer: Unemployed and in the labor force
Explanation: The labor force is the term that is used for the total of population that comes into the range of employment age, and are either employed or unemployed.
Unemployed refers to those individuals who are seeking for a job but are not getting one.
In the given case, Sheila is laid by her employer temporarily, thus she cannot be considered employed but still she is part of labor force.
The total cost of the month will consist of the fixed and variable components. The variable cost is: $23,000 x 0.5 + [5 x (23,000/800)] = 11,500 + 143.75 = $11,643.75. The total cost will therefore be $3,000 + 11,643.75 = $14,643.75. A brief explanation. The variable cost consists of the maintenance cost per unit plus the setup cost for every batch. There's a total of 28.75 (23000/800) costing each $5. We then combine both variable costs and add to fixed cost to arrive at the total cost for the month.
