Answer by YourHope:
Hi! :)
Which statement most accurately describes one way that sarcasm is used in literature?
B) The author use sarcasm to create humor in their writing!
Have a BEAUTIFUL day~
The correct answer is option "A. How the antagonist opposes other characters in the story.
"
The antagonist is the restricting power in a story. It could be a human enemy, or it could be non-human, similar to a creature or something less substantial, similar to fear. The antagonist assumes a vital part in story improvement. Consider a most loved motion picture you jump at the chance to watch. In the event that there is antagonist in a story or motion picture, this is on the grounds that there is a type of enemy. The protagonist in the story is looking for determination; the antagonist opposes such determination, however all great stories require antagonists.
If he continued northwest across the Arabian Sea from Kalhat, Marco Polo would most likely describe Hormuz.
The city of Hormuz is located in current-day Iran, and it is located northwest from Kalhat - also known as Qalhat - which is located north of Sur, in Oman. This is the route that Polo took in his returning trip from China.
On the other hand, both Dhofar and Socotra are southwest from Kalhat, also in Oman. Also, while Venetia is northeast from Kalhat, it would be the last city he would have described after visiting Kalhat.
providing an interesting factasking a thoughtful questionsharing a related quotationtelling a related joke or personal story
Is the correct answer
Answer:
Your results will be speaking beyond your data
Explanation:
Your aim is to conduct a study that will examine sexual assault and proffer recommendations that will be used by administration to change the policy. This policy change will affect the whole campus and not just some members of campus fraternities. Hence if your idea was to examine sexual assault among campus fraternities, then this result would be ideal, but if you are going to use data for a small sub-section of a population to generalize for all other sub-population, then your result would be speaking beyond your data; meaning your data will be insufficient to come up with a result capable of leading to a policy change.
