Answer:
She felt proud and also felt closer to her own heritage and home.
Explanation:
<em>Montreal 1962</em> is a short story by Shauna Singh Baldwin, recollecting her first experience of being a Sardar's wife in a foreign land. She recounts how her husband was asked to remove his hair and turban to be employed.
The short story delves into how she, as a Sardar's wife, felt about her husband's predicament on being asked to be 'normal' like the Canadians and get rid of his natural identity- the turban and his hair and be clean-shaven. While her husband was out working, she took upon herself to wash and then work on even trying to tie a turban, like her husband and others must have done before her. And in the process, she began to understand the significance and even the cultural significance of the turban. She felt that it is what makes them “them”, declaring that she will not let their tradition and culture be taken away from them.
She came to the realization of the turban's significance in their lives and decides to stand by him no matter what happens. She will work for her hands and help him to tie his turban, and then she <em>"will have taught Canadians what it takes to wear a turban".
</em>
<em></em>
Wow that’s a lot to read let’s see what I can do
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "B. making a politician or famous person appear in simpler terms."
Here are the following choices:
<span>A. connecting celebrities or other famous people with a particular product
B. making a politician or famous person appear in simpler terms
C. showing a product being used by a large group of people
D. using a scientist to describe the benefits of a particular product
E. having children act in roles typically filled by adults</span>
Answer: Despite many major developments, the basic principles of the country’s founders are still at play.
In the third paragraph of his inaugural address, JFK discusses the way the world is nowadays, and the way it was back when the United States was born. He argues that the world is very different now, as we now have the tools to eliminate all poverty, but also all life from Earth. However, he believes that the revolutionary ideals of the Founding Fathers are still very relevant in modern times all over the world.
