Answer:
Demand curve for Sheila's plates and cups
Explanation:
we have to write the demand function for Shiela's
we solve for a solving for the line that cross two points:
Then we solve for b:
b = 22.5
Last we build the demand curve
Answer:
total savings using CFL light bulbs = $47.09
Explanation:
We can compare the costs of 8,000 hours of lighting:
incandescent light bulbs
- you need 8 incandescent light bulbs to generate 8,000 hours of lighting = 8 x $0.70 = $5.60
- they will consume a total of 150 watts x 8,000 hours = 1,200 kWh x $0.05 per kWh = $60
- total cost = $5.60 + $60 = $65.60
CFL light bulbs
- you need one CFL light bulb to generate 8,000 hours of lighting = $5.71
- it will consume a total of 32 watts x 8,000 = 256 kWh x $0.05 = $12.80
- total cost = $5.71 + $12.80 = $18.51
total savings = $18.51 - $65.60 = -$47.09
Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
Explanation:
The changes in the exchange rate will affect those domestic firms that sell their products in the foreign market or those domestic firms that produce and sell domestically but has foreign companies as competitors.
If the exchange rate falls, the price of domestic firms will decline as compared to imports. This will create more demand for domestic goods.
If the exchange rate increases domestic goods will become costlier and imports will become cheaper. This will increase the demand for imports.
Tina will react to the mixed evidence in a way that she will
likely become more firmly entrenched in regards with her attitude because of
the fact that she will believe on what she thinks she know is true or just than
the fact that she just obtained.
Answer and Explanation:
Nike
$18,627÷ ($2,494.7a+ $2,795.3b)/2
$18,627÷$2,645 = 7.0 times
Adidas
$10,299÷$1,415c+ $1,459d)/2
10,299÷$1 437= 7.2 times
2,566.2 – 71.5
b2,873.7 – 78.4
c1,527 – 112
d1,570 – 111
Average collection period
Nike
365÷7.0= 52.1 days
Adidas
365÷7.2
= 50.7 days
Therefore Adidas's accounts receivable turnover was about 3% higher [(7.2 – 7.0) ÷7.0] than that of Nike's, which simply means that Adidas was slightly more efficient than Nike in turning accounts receivable into cash.
