Similarities and difference between "inborn talents" from the "new picture" is given below.
Explanation:
“In the past, leadership scholars considered charisma, intelligence and other personality traits to be the key to effective leadership. Accordingly, these academics thought that good leaders use their inborn talents to dominate followers and tell them what to do, with the goal either of injecting them with enthusiasm and willpower that they would otherwise lack or of enforcing compliance.
“In recent years, however, a new picture of leadership has emerged, one that better accounts for leadership performance. In this alternative view, effective leaders must work to understand the values and opinions of their followers—rather than assuming absolute authority—to enable a productive dialogue with followers about what the group embodies and stands for and thus how it should act. By leadership, we mean the ability to shape what followers actually want to do, not the act of enforcing compliance using rewards and punishments.
Leadership effectiveness is the product of individual ability to be the architect of culture, to understand the values and attitudes of followers (who may be colleagues as well as direct reports), and to inspire the contributions, cooperation and mutual support of the people around the would-be leader.
According to this new approach, no fixed set of personality traits can assure good leadership because the most desirable traits depend on the nature of the group being led and the context at hand.
Evidence should be your answer
I'm kind of confused as to what is being asked.... but this is my best answer.
SOCIAL Prejudice, (maybe legal if we talk about the consequence to his actions)
why it cant be the others--->
racial ---- they say nothing about race here.
(MAYBE) legal----- from the passage, we can say that the guy is richhhhh, and he might be able to wave off the consequences of his murder. but then again you only analyze this passage so, probably not
environmental---- they don't mention the environment....
THE REASON WHY IT SHOULD BE SOCIAL- their social standings in this situation
-diamond ring (if thats what they mean by diamond ring finger, it could mean something else as well) only the rich can afford, a cane too
- hotel society gathering... (rich)
-poor Hattie Carroll could be literal as well.
The question is incomplete and the full version can be found online.
Answer: A “These correlational findings do not prove that lack of sleep is causing these problems."
Explanation:
To answer this question, one must first read "Teenagers Who Don’t Get Enough Sleep at Higher Risk for Mental Health Problems" (2015) by Tori Rodriguez. Then, answer the first part of the question, which asks: " Which statement best describes how the author addresses the conflicting evidence in paragraph 3?."
The answer to the first part is:
She acknowledges that some questions remain, even though the link between sleep and mental health is strong.
The answer to Part B of the question is that the detail from paragraph 3 that best supports the answer to Part A is when the author explains that the correlational relationship between the lack of sleep and problems like anxiety has not yet resolved whether the lack of sleep causes anxiety or is anxiety what causes insomnia. And still, most of the research has provided evidence that supports the causal direction being lack of sleep causing problems.
Answer: The narrator of the story was said to be born and raised in south American, but winds up in the neighborhood of Harlem in New York.
The narrator finds that there is an incredible contrast between the North and the South— There is much less racism in New York. Black people is is surprised to find are well respectable in society. White people even obey the directives of a black policeman. In the North there is less amount of racism and people are respected inspite of their races.
Explanation:
