Answer:
Load-distance method.
Explanation:
Load-distance method is a technique of making facility location decisions by an organization. In this method, different facility locations are assigned a load-stance value (it is a measure of the weight of the load to be transported and the distance) and the different facilities are evaluated on the basis of this value. The location with the minimum load-distance will have minimum transportation cost; so, this location will be preferred over the other locations.
<span>If demand increases by 100% in one year, gummy land has two options. First, they could increase their staff and production hours to meet the increased demand. Second, if demand is increased by 100%, gummy land needs to take a look at a supply and demand chart and decide if increasing the price may slow demand by a little bit but will still increase profits. They need to look at an equilibrium price and decide which of the two options makes the most sense economically. If their demand increased by such a large number, it would be reasonable to assume that their demand would not decrease significantly with a slight increase in price.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Great question, intermediaries are sometimes necessary since they provide a service in which you might not be able to get the product if their service wasn't provided. That being said we can say that Caesar's claim is not valid in many cases. Intermediaries tend to add an additional cost to a certain product, but like mentioned above they are providing an essential value. In many cases the value they create more than offsets the costs they add. Therefore the validity of Caesar's claim is dependent on the intermediaries provided value.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The likely outcoe could be,
Likely be:
- Glinda will win, because the statute of limitations starts to run on the date, she filed a suit, i.e. Feb.22, 2014.
- Glinda will win, because the statute of limitations starts to run from the time that the she discovered the breach, i.e. Jan. 17, 2014.
Likely not be:
- Glinda will lose, because the statute of limitations ran on Jan. 13, 2013, i.e. two years after the date the contract was entered on Jan. 14, 2011.
-Glinda will lose, because the statute of limitations requires a demonstration of attempt to cure.