Read the passage from "How Should One Read a Book?”
Yet few people ask from books what books can give us. Most commonly we come to books with blurred and divided minds, asking of fiction that it shall be true, of poetry that it shall be false, of biography that it shall be flattering, of history that it shall enforce our own prejudices. If we could banish all such preconceptions when we read, that would be an admirable beginning.
The reader can conclude that the passage comes from a(n)
biography.
essay.
myth.
play.
Answer:
Essay
Explanation:
According to the passage from "How Should One Read a Book?”, the author talks about banishing preconceived notions about books and authors from readers before reading. She states that most people read books with a blurred mind and divided minds to enforce their own prejudices.
Therefore, the reader can conclude that the passage comes from an essay.
This is because, an essay is a literary writing that outlines the perspective of the writer about a certain topic, and from the passage, the author talks about his perspective on the prejudices of readers.
1. The three boxers met at the gym. Simple subject is a part of the sentence which tells us who or what performs the action in a sentence. Simple predicate tells as what subject does in a sentence. I've put simple subject and simple predicate in this sentence in bold. The tree boxers is a subject, because it tells us who performed the action and tells us what the subject did.
2. <span>Amy took her dog to the veterinarian. Amy is the simple subject because it tells us who did something in the sentence without and it doesn't include any modifiers, took is the simple predicate because it tells us what Amy did and it also doesn't include any modifiers.</span>
3. <span>Luke boarded the airplane. According to the rule mentioned in the first question, Luke is the simple subject because it answers the question who performed the action and there are no modifiers; boarded is the simple predicate which answers the question what the subject did and there are no modifiers.</span>
4. <span>Rachel redecorated her dining room. Rachel is the simple subject, because it tells us who redecorated the dining room; decorated is the simple predicate because it tells us what Rachel did and there are no modifiers.
</span>
5. <span>The lightning struck Bill’s house. The lightning is the simple subject because it answers the question what struck Bill's house; struck is the simple predicate because it answers the question what the lightning did to the Bill's house and there are no modifiers.</span>
I think is B that what i think
You would be looking for context clues in your quote that describe, "Grendal", as being a monster.
"...the blood drank in currents,"
"...he soon had the dead man's Feet and hands, too, eaten entirely"
Both those quotes seem to be monster-ish to me.
I don't know if this Grendal is a literal or symbolic monster, ie: cannibal.
I'm not going to directly tell you what to write but it should just be as simple as saying how each quote (I recommend using two quotes) about what Grendal is doing is also something that a monster might do.
Answer:
1- was to were, 2- is to are, 3- hope to hopes to, 4- but now to now
