Well I'm guessing that I can pick out of these answers: <span>a. It helps the reader understand the implications of events better than the narrator could.
b. It makes the story more interesting for the reader by adding a layer of mystery.
c. It allows the reader to understand and better relate to the motivations of the narrator.
d. It allows the reader to cast judgment toward the narrator in the story.
e. It indicates the thoughts of the narrator and other characters more clearly to the reader.
</span>
// I've seen this question before on plato
Out of all of them the correct answer is c. It allows the reader to understand and better relate to the motivations of the narrator.
Answer:
A, B, & D
Explanation:
Did the quiz and got it right!
Answer and Explanation:
Sylvia Stults explored climate change through poetry and literature. She was able to write a very influential poem, where she was able to point out in an incisive way the negative impacts of environmental pollution, where climate changes were associated. Sylvia Stults, in her poem, shows how nature has been negatively modified over the years, causing degradation, dishonest and excessive exploitation and contamination of what is essential for our life, nature.
Greta Thunberg, on the other hand, approaches environmental changes in a more political way, drawing the attention of directives of great leaders and political organizations so that they can fix the environmental problems they have created, thus guaranteeing a future for children who are not responsible for pollution, degradation and climatic changes that are being submitted.
The lines are spoken by <u>Friar Lawrence</u> to <u>Capulet</u>, and it refers to the heaven being bothered to <u>Capulet</u> by some past sin he committed. At the same time, <u>Friar Lawrence</u> mentions that <u>Capulet </u>should stop trying to go against heaven and stop challenging it and questioning the reasons why the wedding became a funeral.
Answer:
Explanation:
The key in Risk Management is to make a well-informed decision to have the greatest possibility of avoiding damages or to be able to control them if they happen.
In the example, even if a wire fence has been installed to keep wild marine life outside of the swimming area, the best to do is to confirm if the suitable authorities have approved that fence so we are sure, first of all that swimming is really safe and, that in front of an undesirable event, we will have someone to whom raise a claim against.
