Introduction:
We use an objective tone to provide information in a neutral, impersonal way.<em> An objective tone focuses only in the facts and sticks to the information only</em>, it avoids personal pronouns and judgmental words.
When a text tells us something about the writer (his opinion or how he feels about the subject) we are using a subjective tone.
Answer:
You will regret not listening to me if you fail to use my solution.
- <em>This statement is</em><em> not written in an objective tone</em><em>, because the writer is expressing his opinion on how the reader will feel if he or she doesn't use the writer's solution. </em>
Extending the library's hours by one hour on weekends will maximize students' ability to conduct research.
- <em>This statement is </em><em>using an</em><em> </em><em>objective tone</em><em> because it is sticking to the facts and not expressing any opinion on the topic. </em>
Thank you for taking the time to consider this proposal.
- <em>This statement </em><em>uses an objective tone</em><em>, because it doesn't tells us how the writer feels about the proposal. </em>
Composting waste from lunches is one of my best ideas for helping to save the environment.
- <em>This statement </em><em>is not using an objective tone</em><em>, it is using a subjective tone because the writer lets us know he is excited for having one of his best ideas.</em>
Answer:
Extraordinary
Explanation:
The answer is <u>extraordinary</u> because out of all the other words, it it's more positive. Outlandish, strange, and unusual would put a negitive impact on the sentence.
<em>The aye-aye is one of the most </em><u><em>extraordinary</em></u><em> looking creatures on earth.</em>
<span>-Would the Wright brothers’ first powered airplane have been successful if they had chosen other materials?
This is the best revision of the research question because it provides an avenue for exploration rather than just asking a simple question that can be answered in a single sentence. Included in this question would be the answer to her first question, because you cannot determine if other materials would have been better unless you know the materials that were actually used, but it also allows for interpretation and in depth analysis too. </span>