Answer:
In kJ/kg.K - 1.005 kJ/kg degrees Kalvin.
In J/g.°C - 1.005 J/g °C
In kcal/ kg °C 0.240 kcal/kg °C
In Btu/lbm-°F 0.240 Btu/lbm degree F
Step-by-step explanation:
given data:
specific heat of air = 1.005 kJ/kg °C
In kJ/kg.K
1.005 kJ./kg °C = 1.005 kJ/kg degrees Kelvin.
In J/g.°C
In kcal/ kg °C
For kJ/kg. °C to Btu/lbm-°F
Need to convert by taking following conversion ,From kJ to Btu, from kg to lbm and from degrees C to F.
1.005 kJ/kg C = 0.240 Btu/lbm degree F
Answer:
A. Because the measure of the angle 
is 
and the angles and 
are Vertical angles. Therefore, they are congruent ( 
)
B. 
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3> <em><u>The missing figure is attached.</u></em></h3><h3 />
You can observe in the figure that the parallel lines 
and 
are intersected by a another line 
(this is a transversal).
Let's begin with PART B:
Observe that the angles 
and are located inside the parallel lines and they alternate sides of the transversal. Therefore, we can determine that these angles are "Alternate Interior Angles".
Since the lines and are parallel, we know that the Alternate Interior Angles are congruent. Then:
Now we can solve the PART A.
Observe the figure.
Since the angle and the angle share the same vertex, they are "Vertical angles" and, therefore, they are congruent:
Answer:
No
It could be purely due to chance.
Step-by-step explanation:
A population is defined as the whole group which has the same characteristics. For example a population of the college belongs to the same college . But a sample may be an element of a population.
So it is not necessary for a population to have the same characteristics as the sample.
But it is essential for the sample to have at least one same characteristics as the population.
So we would not be correct in inferring that such a relationship also exists in the population.
It is a hypothesis which can be true or false due to certain conditions or limitations as the case maybe.
For example in a population of smokers some may be in the habit of taking cocaine. But a sample of cocaine users does not mean the whole population uses it.
It could be purely due to chance if we find out that there is a relationship between parents’ and children’s party identification in the population.
