Answer:
relevance
Explanation:
Mr Young argument that he studied his notes and chapters for 18 hours before taking the exam and yet did not get good grade and thought he deserved a higher grade fails the standard of relevance. His argument is not important to the subject matter and lacks the existence to make the subject matter a fact. You can study for as long as you want, but there are other factors that determines good grades that Mr. Young did not consider, such as ability to retain information, intelligence level, and others.
1. My, Farmington, Virginia
2. Last, Colorado, Denver
3. Enter, Boyce, Thompson, arboretum, Picketpost
4. B
5. D
6. South, West, California
Idk 7?
8. Marissa’s, Shetland
Idk 9?
Hope this helps!
I believe the correct answer is - <span>Garcia uses formal, academic language and location words to suggest a theory about fate.
As you can see in the excerpt above, Garcia is using words such as vagaries, happenstance, etc, which are not normally used in everyday conversations. Thus, they are a bit formal, academic, and suggest a certain message in the text.
</span>
<span>1) Gracie and Helen had not seen each other FOR 50 years.
2) "Tell me ABOUT Grandpa." said Randy.
3) They carried the water packs ON their backs.
4) I would go INTO the garden, but it is muddy.
5) Tommy passed the peas TO his mother.
6) We should meet somewhere BEYOND the city limits.
7) The lights activate automatically AFTER sunset.
8) Please put an umbrella IN the trunk.
9) Add pepper TO the soup.
10) Erika waded INTO the stream and looked at the minnows.</span>
The author used verbal irony. What he said was different from what he meant, as it obviously was far from the downpour he described.
