Answer:
The hypothesis that will best demonstrate an economic benefit to the ranchers will be "Pastures with the highest diversity of plant species will have the highest net primary productivity."
Explanation:
This hypotheses would best demonstrate an economic benefit because it clearly states that when plant species are diverse, this will provide the highest net productivity to the ranchers. Hence if the aim of the student is to determine if increasing species diversity of edible plant would lead to great economic benefits, then this suits for the hypotheses.
<span>They are asking about what is known as omnipotence. Omnipotence is an idea (typically in monotheistic religions) where a single being is all-powerful. This of course raises the aforementioned question of how a being could be both all-powerful and simultaneously be merciful in a world where suffering exists. A merciful and omnipotent god should be able and willing to prevent all suffering according to this idea.</span>
It would be interest rate, as they charge you a percentage fee for borrowing their money. (Credit cards!)
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
