answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GrogVix [38]
1 year ago
14

Suppose you are an archaeologist trying to answer this question: When did the first people migrate to North America? Why might t

he answer to this question change over time? What do you think? Check all of the boxes that apply. Scientists might find new sites with human artifacts, thus providing new evidence. Scientist might develop new technology that helps them assign different ages to existing artifacts. Scientists might come up with new theories using existing evidence. Scientists might learn more about the conditions in the world in which prehistoric humans lived.
History
1 answer:
Vinvika [58]1 year ago
3 0

Answer:

These statements apply:

Scientists might find new sites with human artifacts, thus providing new evidence.

If scientists find human artifacts in new places, such a finding would likely change archeological theories about the first migrations to North America.

Scientist might develop new technology that helps them assign different ages to existing artifacts.

If new technology is used to assess the time period of certain artefacts, and that technology determines that the time period is different, then what happens is that the time period itself to which archeological evidence was tied changes, meaning that the dates previously established have to be revised.

Scientists might come up with new theories using existing evidence.

If scientists can developed new sound theories using existing evidence, then it is likely that the dates previously set are modified.

You might be interested in
What was the “Great Compromise” in drafting the new constitution?
BabaBlast [244]

The great compromise in drafting the new constitution was a plan for states representation in congress.

The great compromise also known as Sherman compromise, the Connecticut compromise, the great compromise of 1787. It was an agreement made between the large and small states which involve how each state would be represented under the constitutions of the United States including the legislature.

Further Explanation

This agreement took place in 1787. The great compromise was as a result of a strong debate among larger and states delegate as to the number of representatives that each state could have in the congress.

The great compromise resulted in the establishment of two chambered of the congress. The house of representatives was also created and it was determined mainly the population of each states.  

The bicameral legislature was retained based on the agreement but the upper house was adjusted in order to allow two senators from each state. The agreement was a successful one and it helped in the restructuring of American government. The highly populated states demands were met while the less populous states demand and interest was also protected.  

Before the constitutional convention of 1787, states like virginal were favored in the congressional representation based on its larger population while state with less population wanted equal representation.

LEARN MORE:

  • Great Compromise brainly.com/question/793715

KEYWORDS:

  • great compromise
  • bicameral legislature
  • american government
  • house of representatives
  • senators
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement BEST describes the philosophy of Sir Robert Filmer? A. Kings derive their power from the consent of their subjec
almond37 [142]

Answer:

<em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>s</em><em>:</em>

<em><u>O</u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>B</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>b</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>b</u></em><em><u>j</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>

Explanation:

hope this works out!!!!!!

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the excerpt from chapter 10 of Animal Farm.
Dmitrij [34]

Naïve citizens allow corrupt governments.

In literature, <u>situational irony</u> creates a contrast between what the readers might expect and what actually happens in the text. The goal is to shed light on the difference between appearances and the reality, with regard to a particular theme.

Here, the irony is that even though the farm produces more and gains more money, the animals who worked for this progress to happen are not getting the profits of this improvement. All the money goes to the hands of the ruling class (the pigs and the dogs), because the other animals are naïve enough to believe that the rulers' "supervision and organisation" work is enough to justify this unfair wealth distribution.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the year 1800 in europe, bill was experiencing hysteria: he had become blind, but he had no physical reason to be so. his doc
elixir [45]
Hysteria, on time of Sigmund Freud (Victorian Era) was a term coined for what today is called 'anxiety'. The fear or apprehension on what may happen next. Bill became blind without proper reason, in today's case, this is called Conversion Disorder. To treat, Bill must treat the source of anxiety first thru series of therapies.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
carnegie nicknamed rockefeller's process "reckafellow." Was Carnegie's strategy superior to Rockefellers? explain your reasoning
Novay_Z [31]

Henry Ford monopolized oil industry, his company, “Standard Oil Company”,  would either force a competitor out of business  or buy it out.

This was a ruthless tactic, he used horizontal integration to buy up competitors, and drove them out of business, that is why he received the nickname "Reckafellow".

Carnegie switched from railroading to become the master of the steel industry with the U.S. Steel Corporation. He used vertical integration. This company became dominate in steel largely because of his administrative abilities and hired excellent people.


6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • use multiple causation to explain the relationship between the last ice age and different cultural patterns in the northern and
    8·1 answer
  • What best describes the “Three Principles of the People”?
    14·2 answers
  • What were some of the arguments against New Deal policies? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • The city of __________ began as an early French trading community established by the Chouteau brothers. A. New Orleans B. Muskog
    10·2 answers
  • Why has increasing farm production failed to prevent malnutrition and famine in developing nations?
    6·2 answers
  • which aspect of english government traditions did not influence leaders in the united states? a.an increase in centrally held po
    13·2 answers
  • What three roles does the dialogue play in this passage? "Lloyd, I’m warning you. If you read a single word from my diary, I wil
    11·2 answers
  • Thomas Jefferson welcomed the Missouri Compromise as a strong and permanent process to maintain the union.
    11·1 answer
  • Which describes an atom that has fewer neutrons than protons and more electrons than protons?
    7·1 answer
  • a historian interpreting the passage would most likely explain that the audience of the sermon is an illustration of the fact th
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!