" ... Why to a public count I might not go. Is the great love the general gender bear him. Who, dipping all his faults in their affection ... "
Not verbatim, but that part is the answer. I got it correct on Plato, if you're concerned about that.
Explanation:
The bill can be sponsered by more than one member of congress , including both chambers. However the president of the senate or the vice president can not sponser the bill. The fist thing they do is give the bill either a "S" or a "HR" bepending on where it started. For this example is will start in the senate. After the "S" and number then they vote to see how long the debate about the bill will last .Next they will send the bill to a committee. Once the bill is approved by the committee the bill is sent to the floor of the senate .There the bill can be voted to be either approved or denied . If the bill if approved then then they will send it to the House of Representatives if they make any changes then the bill is sent back to the Senate for approval. If the bill is approved then the bill is sent to the President.
This is an opinionated question, they are asking you, but I guess I can help. If I was a government leader, one step I would do is to stop allowing individuals to travel back to our country from theirs until the disease is eliminated. Travel is a horrible way of spreading diseases individuals have never been exposed to. Also, they need pesticides. The reason the African people die so much is because they don't want the help of modern medicine, which is ignorant. I understand they want to be primitive and respectful of their ancestors, but they need help if they want to eliminate the Malaria disease for good.
From the consumer's point of view,
Outsourcing of jobs : Will be positive. Because this will result in Cheaper labor and faster distribution of products
Cheaper Good: Will also be positive for consumers. Because they could allocate their money for something else.
Cheap Labor: Also positive for the consumers because this will lead to cheaper good.
Answer:
(Option 3) Palestinian refugees have a deep yearning to return to their homes.
Explanation:
It keeps referring to leaving their joys and sorrows in Palestine. In the end it said "We left them, hoping to return".
In process of elimination, the tone is sad, so option 1 is incorrect. It never mentioned about a new homeland, canceling option 4. The article wasn't focused on orchards and flowers, leaving only option 3, so option 3 is correct
